If you are a Southern Baptist you have heard of the Cooperative Program. At the very least you have seen the advertisements with pictures of third world countries and missionaries on foreign fields. If you don’t know anything about the Cooperative Program, here is a brief history.

In 1845 the Southern Baptist Convention was formed with two cooperative ministries and one agenda. The two ministries were the Foreign Mission Board (Now the IMB) and the Domestic Mission Board (Now NAMB). The agenda of the Convention was simple, to combine the efforts of autonomous churches for “one sacred effort”, the propagation of the gospel.

In 1919 denominational leaders proposed a pledge campaign that would allow Baptist churches to collectively fund missions and various ministries of the Southern Baptist Convention. Out of this campaign a larger vision for cooperation was born, and in 1925 the Cooperative Program became the uniform Southern Baptist conduit of funds for mission work.

Baptists have always been mission minded, and when it was first instituted in the early 1900’s the Cooperative Program offered an efficient way for Baptist churches to pool their resources together for funding missions’ efforts around the world. At that point in the convention’s history the decision was made that state conventions would be the collecting agent of those funds.

Just so you know, State conventions are autonomous organizations that adopt their own governing documents, guide their own ministries, approve their own budgets, and manage their own employees.

From the outset in the early 1900’s the ideal was a 50/50 split between the state conventions and the Southern Baptist Convention. Yet, this 50/50 allocation has rarely been achieved.

Over the last quarter of a century the average percentage of funds that proceed through the state conventions and go on to the Southern Baptist Convention is around 35%. From the outset, “on average”,  the state conventions keep 65% of all Cooperative Program gifts. The 35% left is divided at the national level – a very small portion going to the seminaries, some going to the International Mission Board, and some going to the North American Mission Board. What some people don’t realize is that NAMB has cooperative agreements with many of the State Conventions – which means that some state conventions receive money back from NAMB beyond and over their initial 65%.

Because the money that filters through the Cooperative Program originates with the undesignated gift of individuals to their local church, Southern Baptist’s have the right and responsibility to know where their money is actually going. Furthermore, Southern Baptists should always consider whether or not the ministry endeavors they support are contextually effective, resource efficient, and theologically sound.

It would seem to me that the Cooperative Program is broken. We are pouring the majority of our money into areas of our country that already have plenty of churches. Those churches need to plant other churches. Plus, we are not providing enough resources for foreign missions. We should be able to properly train and send out workers into the foreign mission fields with no excuse.

Our current system does not make sense in my opinion. What’s even funnier is that many Southern Baptists use the Cooperative Program as “the measure” of loyalty in our convention.

Consider this.

2 thoughts on “The Southern Baptist Convention and the Cooperative Program

  1. You have incorrect information here. THere may be some state conventions who keep 65% of CP in their state, but not all. You have painted all with the same brush and have painted a false picture. My guess is that you are stating things that you have heard from unreliable sources and have not investigated these facts for yourself. My is, also, that you have no idea what ministries are offered through a state convention and how far reaching they are. This appears to be nothing more than a regurgiation of statements gathered from other people.

    Before you state negative things and post links to incorrect artilces about my state convention, i would appreicate your verifying the FACTS instead of believing everything you hear from Johnny Hunt and Danny Akin, et al….

    1. Jon,

      I do not appreciate your accusations. None of this has come from Hunt or Akin. I think you should study the Cooperative Program. Here is a good resource.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s