Biblical Theology- Part 9: God’s Rule through Israel’s King’s

Note: This series comes from the notes of a course I am teaching on Biblical Theology at Calvary Baptist Church. This material is organized similar to Graeme Goldsworthy’s book According to Plan.

The Need for a King

As we have seen in the book of Joshua Israel has successfully taken the land of Canaan as God promised. As we move into the book of Judges[1] we are shown Israel’s error of taking their conquered enemies in, and using them for forced labor.[2] “The Lord rebukes them for making covenants with the Canaanites and reminds them that these foreigners will become a snare to them.”[3][4] Their covenant with foreigners proves to be troublesome, because the pattern of rebellion among the Israelite people is continued. After making the covenant with the Canaanites the Israelites begin to be drawn towards their religions[5], which results in the Israelites beginning to “indulge in religious syncretism[6] and even apostasy[7].”[8]

As part of the Old Testament narrative Judges recounts the various attempts in which Israel seeks to establish some sort of leadership over the wayward people. One of the main functions of the book of Judges is “explaining theologically the transition from conquest leadership under Joshua to royal leadership under David.”[9] The account concludes with a reference to the instability and chaos in the land as due to the lack of a king.[10] In fact, the statement that “there was no king in Israel in those days; each man did what was right in his own eyes”[11] summarizes the period, but also points to a transition.

In a cycle familiar to the Old Testament narrative God judges the people of Israel for their faithlessness by allowing their enemies to invade and oppress them, they repent and turn back to God, and God saves them from their enemies.[12] During this period Israel has certain leaders, judges, who exercise rule over the people under God’s guidance.[13] Many times these judges are the instrument through which God uses to save His errant people. The hope is found in God’s mercy as it “appears in His continual sending of saviors and judges.”[14]

What’s ironic about this period is that Israel finally dwells in the promise land, but because of their disobedience they are not enjoying the promised blessings they longed for as they exited Egypt and journeyed to Canaan. Plus, the judges that exercise leadership over the Israelites have obvious flaws in their character which has major implications on the nation as a whole.[15]

This pattern is continued even when the Israelites have a king, because the one they choose must be a leader who abides by God’s law,[16] and all men are stained by the reality of sin. Again, since the king represents the people, his covenant obedience affects the life of the nation. In essence the king of Israel must reflect the character of God to His people.

Kingship and the Kingdom of Israel

Remember, the Bible is a grand narrative and the focus is Jesus Christ the true and greater king of God’s kingdom. When moving forward to examine the kingly rule of Saul, David, and Solomon we need to remember how the Old Testament fits within all of redemptive history. Goldsworthy aptly reminds us:

The events of saving history in the Old Testament prefigure and demonstrate the pattern of the one true and perfect saving act yet to come. They do it well enough to point the people of that time to a way of salvation by grace through faith.[17]

Remember, in every instance that Israel is saved in the Old Testament it is a gracious act of God. The continual failure of the Israelites and their leaders all point to the fact that some greater act of salvation is still ahead, in fact must come, in the future. These people and events provide the ‘type’[18] of that which is to come.

Therefore we need to notice the distinction between the pattern and the perfection. In the people and events of the Old Testament we see that there is a great inadequacy, something is incomplete, which longs for ultimate fulfillment in the life and work of Jesus Christ. In other words, what we see in the Old Testament is the first stages of God’s progressively revealed salvation.[19] Everything in the Old Testament points beyond the historical events or persons themselves to Jesus Christ, since fulfillment of all God’s promises are found in His saving work. With that in mind lets look at Saul, David, and Solomon.

Kingship Established with Saul

When the narrative picks up in the books of Samuel Israel is in disarray: “though the Israelites live in the land promised by God to the patriarchs, their hold on it is threatened by the Philistines, who are only the last of a series of foreign enemies sent as judgment on Israel’s unfaithfulness.”[20]

During this time a prophet named Samuel arises under the leadership of Eli, the priest of the Lord, in the sanctuary. The devastating encounters with the Philistines lead the people to proclaim a need for a king. Samuel was distressed at the people because to set up a human king would be to supplant God as Israel’s leader.[21] But the design of kingship had been established long before this period by God himself;

  1. Jacob prophesied of the kingship in Judah.[22]
  2. Written into the decrees and ordinances of the law were provision for a king.[23]

Within the law of Israel a kings rule was to reflect the covenant relationship established with God. So, kingship in Israel was defined by the covenant, and was therefore theocratic.[24] But the people of Israel seemed to model their desire for a king after the autocratic[25] rule of the Canaanite and Philistine kings. Therefore, Israel’s longing for a king at this point was nothing more than a desire to imitate the pagan nations, and the prophet Samuel warns[26] them of their folly in rejecting and not desiring God’s pattern for kingly rule.[27]

Ultimately the people were after security, safety, and strength by their own means, ignoring that God had promised them in the covenant. It is understandable, then, that Samuel later accuses the people of failing to trust God.[28] The Israelites had forgotten “that God has committed Himself…to giving them those things in a way that no pagan ruler could.”[29] Nevertheless, God instructs Samuel to comply with their request because ultimately it is His will that the people of Israel be ruled by a king.

Saul is chosen as the first king by the drawing of lots. Saul’s rule looks promising as he acts as a savior-judge of Israel. In fact, “He is ready to recognize[30] the hand of the Lord in his victory over the Ammonites.”[31] At this point Samuel reminds Saul and the people of Israel that if they follow the Lord, all will be well.[32] But sin rears its ugly head again. When Saul doubts God’s ability to deliver his dwindling army, he decides to take up the role of priest and make an unlawful sacrifice, not keeping the covenant stipulations that the Lord had provided. The prophet Samuel then tells Saul that his kingdom will not continue, because the Lord desires a ruler who is “after His own heart.” [33] “Samuel withdrew from Saul to indicate that the Lord had rejected him.”[34] Saul shows in his actions[35] that he is the very opposite of the covenant king that God desires[36] since the king must be subject to God’s word.[37] Thus God rejects his kingship, and brings about a new king to take the throne.

The Dynasty Established through King David

During the reign of Saul God is developing a man after His own heart.[38] The prophet Samuel is sent to choose David from among the sons of Jesse and anoint him as the new king. David is the “youngest and least significant of eight brothers who is chosen.”[39] But the Spirit of the Lord comes upon David and leaves Saul.[40] In fact, David’s rise to power is summed up in 2 Samuel 5:10; he was successful because the Lord was with him.

The first incident of God’s blessing being evident on David is the narrative of ‘David vs. Goliath.’[41] Here is the future king of Israel empowered by the Spirit of God to represent God’s people against the Philistines; this is a beautiful picture of what is to come in the savior-kingship of Christ. Goldsworthy puts it like this:

As all Israel retreats in terror from the Philistines and their champion [Goliath], God’s anointed king, who appears weak and insignificant, fights for his people knowing that the battle is the Lord’s. David stands alone as the one in the place of many, and through him God works salvation for Israel.

In the same way, Jesus is the true and greater David whose victory becomes his people’s victory, though they never lifted a stone to accomplish it themselves. Now, at this point Saul’s jealousy is enflamed and continues to burn until he decides to go after David’s life. David flees Saul’s presence knowing the intense rejection and anger that is kindled towards him. Thus, “David became an outlaw in the wilderness.”[42]

Yet in the midst of such turmoil David trusts in God to spare his own life and remove Saul from kingship by His own accord. Therefore David refuses to kill King Saul on two occasions when it would have been very easy, he leaves it to the Lord to bring about His will in His time,[43] knowing that God will vindicate him. Simply put, David “committed his cause to God, and trusted God to judge His enemies and to keep His promise.”[44]

Eventually Saul looses his sanity, looses his kingship, and dies on Mount Gilboa in a battle with the Philistines, which is somewhat ironic.[45] At the age of thirty David is crowned as king, and the Lord continues to bless his rule. Goldsworthy notes several factors that point to David’s successful campaign as king.

  1. David secures the boarders of Israel against the Philistines by defeating them, while providing rest for the people.[46]
  2. He conquers the Jebusite’s control of Jerusalem and establishes it as his capital, which also provides a central location for Israel’s corporate worship.[47]
  3. He brings the Ark of the Covenant back to Jerusalem making God’s kingship visible in Israel. It could be said that God validates David’s kingship by allowing him to bring the ark into ‘David’s city’, making it the locus of Israel’s religious and political life.[48]
  4. The Davidic Covenant itself establishes David’s seed and dynasty.[49]

David also decided that he was going to build a permanent temple for the Ark in Jerusalem.[50] The prophet Nathan comes to David on the behalf of the Lord forbidding the building of the temple. God had promised to make David’s name great and to give his people rest in their land. God did not want David to build the house of God (a temple) but will himself make for David a house (a dynasty).[51] David is to bear a son who will build a temple and whose throne will be established forever.[52] Consider the continuity of the covenant with David to the covenant made to Abraham;

  1. “I will be their God, they will be my people.”[53]
  2. “I will be his father, and he shall be my son.”[54]

David’s line was going to depend on God’s grace. David was not called to build a temple, he was a warrior.[55] It was only when the wars were over, when the Lord had subdued all the enemies of the kingdom; then and only then, would the Temple be built.[56] This would happen under the rein of Solomon, David’s son.

The Eternal Kingship Established through Solomon

The notable features of King Solomon are narrated in a way that shows him to be the one who puts the finishing touches on the glories of David’s reign.[57] In fact, Clowney writes that the reign of Solomon completes the reign of David, and they must be taken together. So, together David and Solomon picture the Lord’s king. “David the royal warrior is succeeded by Solomon, the prince of peace[58].”

Solomon is often considered the wisest king to ever live. Solomon’s wisdom and desire for understanding direct his governance of the people.[59] The significance of wisdom in Solomon’s rule is shown in his desire for justice[60], achieving prosperity in the land according to the covenant promise[61], and understanding the relationships between each part of creation.[62]

Solomon’s reign is directly tied to the building of the beautiful temple using the resources established in his fathers reign. The building of the Temple tells us two things of the Davidic Kingdom;

  1. In the ancient Near East, the culmination of a king’s military campaign was often culminated by the building of a palace or temple.
  2. Also, it was common among the ancient Near East that if a ruler is permitted to build a temple for a deity, that implies the deity’s blessing upon his rule.

The permanent structure of the temple in the Promised Land replaces the tabernacle. When the ark is brought into the sanctuary the glory of the Lord fills the house.[63] “The long march of the centuries had come to rest.”[64] God had brought His people out of bondage in Egypt to Jerusalem (David’s city), the place of His dwelling.

The building of the temple proclaimed that God will dwell in the city of David with His people.[65] The temple was the place where sacrifices were made. The temple was the place where reconciliation with God was made. When sin infected the relationship of the people with God repentance and prayer toward the temple would secure forgiveness.[66] In other words, through the temple the covenant relationship with God was maintained.[67]

Beyond this Goldsworthy points out the significance of the temple system to those outside of the Israelites:

At the temple foreigners can find acceptance with God.[68] The temple is a witness to all nations that God dwells with Israel…In other words; a foreigner can be joined to the people of God only by coming to the temple, for it is here that God chooses to deal with those who seek Him.[69]

The Gospel of Jesus Christ

Clowney aptly reminds us that “the appointed roles of God’s servants point forward to their fulfillment in God’s final Servant, Jesus Christ. They have a symbolic function, providing a key to the way in which the historical narratives of the Old Testament demonstrates types of the work of Christ.”[70]

1. A Pattern for the King to Come.

God establishes human kingship in the reign of Saul. Through David God brings the ark to Jerusalem, thus making the city the focal point of God’s covenant relationship with His people. God uses the reign of Solomon to build the temple as His dwelling place within the city. At the heart of their rule were the covenant promises of God. The king represented the whole nation and mediated God’s rule to the people.

Through the establishment of kingship over Israel God shows the pattern for the coming King’s rule over the earth. The ministry of these kings foreshadowed the King to come from the line of David. In one way “David foreshadows the longsuffering restraint of Christ’s humiliation[71], while Solomon typifies Christ as the Judge, who ushers in the Kingdom[72] by judging justly.”[73]

The covenant with David[74] looked beyond Solomon, and would be far greater than Solomon; He would be the Lord Jesus Christ from the house of David.[75] Christ is the true hope for the future.[76] Christ is the true King mediating God’s rule over the nations.[77]

Unlike these kings, Jesus kept in covenant with perfect obedience and trust in God, and therefore was exalted as King of Kings and Lord of Lords. The kingship in Israel pointed to a true and greater King, Jesus Christ.[78]

2. God’s Devotion to His Promises.

For each of the kings, their “place in the history of God’s redemption is grounded in [their] calling not in [their] obedience. Quite evidently, each of these kings are far from a perfect example for us. Even the greatest king, David, “a man of faith, who repented of sin and trusted in the Lord’s salvation”[79] was not perfect. This illustrates that God’s plans cannot be thwarted. It also shows us God’s devotion to His promises.

“The amazing grace of God appears in this devotion…The Old Testament term for loyalty or devotion (chesed) is used almost exclusively, not of our devotion toward God, but of His devotion toward us.” One the one hand, David was a man after God’s own heart, a king who was devoted to the Lord. But on the other hand, David’s great sin with Bathsheba showed imperfection in that devotion.[80] The same can be said of Solomon, his heart was not fully devoted to God, in his old age his foreign wives turned his heart away.[81] When it came to the actions of these human kings, it was God’s name that was at stake. But even when these kings fell into sin, God remained faithful to His promise.[82]

Thank God that He was faithful to His promises because He sustained and orchestrated David’s line to bring about a greater King who was without sin, represents us to God, and mediates God’s rule to His people with grace. While we have these earthly kings to show us the pattern, the only true, faithful, just, and eternal King is Jesus Christ who creates a new people under His governance, and His kingdom will never end.

Continue reading “Biblical Theology- Part 9: God’s Rule through Israel’s King’s”

The gospel of Jesus Christ and the Gospel accounts.

Here is one of the most profound and concise arguments on the significance of the historical accuracy and supernatural nature of the events in the Gospel accounts, and how it relates to the gospel message.

“Other religions are primarily philosophies. That is, they are sets of teaching about how to live. Christianity is primarily an announcement of events in history, things that happened. Those events include the incarnation (God becoming a human being), the crucifixion (the God-man dying in our place), and the resurrection (the God-man breaking death so he can live with us and us with him).

Other religions have accounts of miracles, but they only authenticate or exemplify the founders’ teaching. But whether the miracles happened or not does not ultimately make any difference, because it is the following of the teaching that saves us. But in the Christian faith, we are saved by grace, not our performance. We are saved not by what we do but what he has done. Therefore, it is the miraculous events which actually save us. We’re saved NOT by the teaching, but by these historical events.

Thus, if you take away the historical events of Christ’s life and death and resurrection, you take away the heart of Christianity, and it becomes just another life-philosophy that saves you through your own self-effort.”

From Redeemer’s study on Mark.

Biblical Theology- Part 8: God’s Faithfulness and Israel’s Faithlessness

Note: This series comes from the notes of a course I am teaching on Biblical Theology at Calvary Baptist Church. This material is organized similar to Graeme Goldsworthy’s book According to Plan.

In the Pentateuch we are continually reminded of God’s faithfulness to His covenant promises. In being brought out of Egypt and having God covenant with them, Israel, the new nation was “re-born” as the people of God. It would seem that God’s promises to the Patriarchs were now becoming reality as the Israelites looked ahead to possessing the promised land of Canaan.

The torah narrative continues in Numbers where God’s covenant people are standing in the valley of Mount Sinai headed to the Promise Land. The looming question as we read the narrative is how will God choose to fulfill His promises? We begin to see a pattern, the fulfillment and delay of fulfillment of God’s promises are the organizing principle of the reminder of the Pentateuch and of Joshua.[1]

God’s Presence among His People

Commenting Numbers Goldsworthy notes that “nothing summarizes the position of Israel and the nature of God so well as the famous blessing that God told Aaron, Moses brother, to pronounce over the people.”[2]

The Lord bless (good harvest, peace, children) you and keep you (guard and protect);
The Lord make his face to shine
(a pledge of good favor) upon you and be gracious to you;
The Lord lift up his countenance
(treating them with good favor) upon you and give you peace (overall ‘well-being’).

These words are very significant to Israel’s identity; they speak the people’s restoration to God and God’s provision for His people in a fallen world. More importantly, the very name of God rests upon Israel.[3] Therefore, they have been chosen to proclaim the one true God to the nations. This never changes, because it is a gift of sheer grace based on election.

The presence of God is also witnessed in God’s gift of the Tabernacle. Throughout Moses writings we continue to see that the tabernacle was central to the life, organization, and governance of Israel. In fact, the organization of Israel’s camp demonstrated this. “The layout of the camp was carefully organized: the tribes formed an outside circle and the priests an inner one, with the tabernacle at the center. This organization was maintained even as Israel moved throughout the wilderness on their journey to the Promise Land.[4] Both in camp and while marching, the tabernacle was central, just as God was central to the very heart of the nation.

Within Israel Moses continues “his unique ministry as prophet and priest”[5] as God instructs him from above the mercy seat in the tabernacle on how God’s people are to properly live in relationship with Him. The details of God’s instruction are very meaningful. “The emphasis on preparations is so strong…that the long-awaited fulfillment of God’s promise to Abraham concerning the land of Canaan appears to be imminent.”[6] Furthermore, to signify the presence of God, during the day a cloud rested above the tabernacle and during the night it was fire.[7]

“The sense that God actually lives among His people is enhanced by the guidance of Israel by the cloud. Whenever it is taken up from the tabernacle the people move on until the cloud stops at the place they are to rest. This is a pilgrim people whose God goes with them.”[8]

God’s name, the tabernacle, and His very presence leading Israel signify the fulfillment of the covenant, and the relationship of grace He has initiated with them. They begin they journey from Mount Sinai to the Promise Land and all is well in the first 10 chapters of Numbers. But at the 11th chapter there is a sudden transition to rebellion which “vividly draws attention to the fickleness of the Israelites.”[9]

Israel’s Faithlessness

Simply put, Israel did not trust God. There are several instances where “the people refused to accept difficult conditions God was making them endure.[10][11] There were also instances where the people refused to accept the leaders God had provided for them.[12] “Nothing is more remarkable than the grace of God, and nothing illustrates that grace more than God’s perseverance and goodness to a continually rebellious and impatient people.”[13] Here are two examples from Israel’s history of rebellion and doubt in spite of God’s promises.

  1. One of the most forthright examples of the Israelites rebellion occurred while Moses was away on Mount Sinai when the people created and worshipped the golden calf. Because of Moses intercession for them, as their mediator, God did not pour out His wrath on them even though they deserved it.[14] Notice that the Levites were faithful during this episode, thus God appoints them to guard the tabernacle.
  2. Another explicit rebellion of the people of Israel is their refusal to enter the Promise Land.[15] Twelve scouts are sent to spy and report on the land of Canaan. Ten of them return in fear because of the strength of the people and their large fortified city, thus incite fear among the Israelites. Yet Joshua and Caleb remind the people of God’s presence.[16] But the Israelites remain faithless arguing that obtaining the land is impossible and it would be better to return to Egypt.

In light of His people’s faithlessness God declares to Moses: “How long will this people despise me? And how long will they not believe in me?”[17] Again, Moses intercedes for the people and prevents their total destruction,[18] but they are judged. God declares that only Joshua and Caleb will enter the Promise Land with a new generation of Israelites. In other words, those who experienced the power of God in the exodus will wander for forty years in the desert and die there. Simply put, Israel would not trust God.

While in the wilderness a plague of deadly snakes is sent as judgment among God’s grumbling people. Moses cries out to God and intercedes for the people and is told to set a bronze snake on a pole in the middle of the camp. If anyone was bitten by one of these deadly snakes they were told to simply look as the bronze snake and they would be saved from death.[19] Looking at the bronze snake was simply an act of faith in the promise of God. “The brass serpent, the image of the curse upon Israel, was lifted up as a sign of God’s power over the curse and His deliverance from it.”[20]

It becomes quite clear that Israel is incapable of keeping their covenant promise. They continue to reject the paradise that God has placed before them, because they are simply afraid of completely trusting God. Near the end of Numbers[21] we are given a list of forty places where the Israelites camped after leaving Egypt, before ending up at the edge of the promise land. “The lengthy description of the long journey suggests that the people are now near their journey’s end; and if God has helped them thus far, then He will surly enable them to reach their goal, the land of Canaan.”[22] Hart reminds us of a reoccurring theme, namely, that God’s promises cannot be thwarted by circumstances or man:

“The failure of Israel to believe seemed to threaten the fulfillment of God’s promise of the land, but by the end of Numbers the picture is bright again. God has not revoked His promise; He is bringing His people into Canaan.”[23]

We continue to see that the history of God’s redemption moves from grace to grace.

Preparing to Enter the Promise Land

Forty years after the exodus event a new generation of Israelites prepare to enter the Promise Land. In the book of Deuteronomy we have the sermonic words Moses gives the Israelites before entering the land under their new leader Joshua.[24]

As the narrative continues we see a covenant renewal with the new generation that reminds and emphasizes Israel of their faithless history and God’s faithfulness to His promises.[25] In fact, much of Moses words are devoted to explaining that “even God’s people are intrinsically sinful, and the inevitability of their moral failure. Despite all God has done for His people, they will surely disobey.”[26] Yet here they stand prepared to enter the Promise Land. Moses exhorts the people to be reminded of God’s grace, and be obedient to God’s voice.[27] So, “to keep ‘moving’, Israel must keep listening and obeying.”[28] Goldsworthy explains:

“Now there is opportunity for a new beginning. The Lord…is a God who fights for His people. But, as ever, the covenant has a conditional side. Deuteronomy repeats the stipulations of the covenant that are to be obeyed…[expressing] the relationship of covenant faithfulness”[29] And the very essence of covenant faithfulness is expressed in these words: Hear, O Israel: The Lord our God, the Lord is one. You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your might.”

If there is only one God, and that God has chosen one people to make Himself known to all other peoples of the world, the grace shown to that people should motivate total devotion from the chosen people. These covenant stipulations, or sanctions, are graciously given to Israel to explain what it means to live in relationship with God by explaining what happens if you obey and what happens if you don’t. The focal point is God’s goodness in choosing and saving Israel, and the blessings that come from His covenant love. This points Israel to be reminded of their responsibility to live as the Holy people of God.

In Deuteronomy we find the “most eloquent expression of the kingdom of God and the purpose of creation.”[30] So, it would be a mistake to think that the reward/punishment structure simply functions to motivate covenant faithfulness by the treat of destruction. Remember, Israel’s salvation was not based on their faithfulness to God[31], but God’s sovereign grace and choice. Thus, they are stirred up to obedience ‘from the heart’[32] in response[33] to God’s redemptive love. “The goal of this election is that Israel should be His people in the good land, the new Eden.”[34][35]

This is something that the faithless Israel does not deserve. Israel may be God’s chosen nation, but not because of their moral stature.[36] In fact, God has chosen a ‘stiff-necked’[37] people who are prone to idolatry and disobedience.”[38][39]

Into the Promise Land[40]

The New Leader Joshua

After forty long years in the wilderness the Israelites are ready to face their enemy. Their new leader Joshua is reminded of God’s promise: God will give them the land and no one will be able to stop Him, and thus them.[41]

Joshua’s name literally meant ‘the Lord has delivered.’[42] Joshua was the successor to Moses and the person divinely chosen to lead the nation of Israel across the Jordan, to take the Promise Land in order to realize the covenant blessings that God had given Israel. So, Joshua gave life to Israel in that though him the covenant promises were realized and fulfilled.

Taking the Promise Land

God has given the land into the hands of the Israelites, but they must take the land in faith.[43] It is the initiative of God to give not only the land, but also the Canaanites into their hands. “As a response to this divine initiative, the first decision they must make on entering the land is to destroy all [remnants] of Canaanite civilization.”[44] There are several reasons for this command:

  1. Israel is primarily acting as God’s agents of judgment upon a wicked civilization.[45]
  2. God makes it clear that Israel would not be able to resist the temptations to turn and worship other gods at this stage in their national development.[46] In fact, “the general threat posed by the peoples of Canaan was so great that Israel had to [wipe out their culture] in order to avoid falling away from God and worshiping other deities.”[47]

“Israel’s conquest of the land is portrayed as a series of victories in which God directs the operation and Israel responds in obedience.”[48] Israel was called to return to God that which belonged to Him.[49] It’s important to notice that God does show grace to those outside of Israel. Rahab was an example of someone who saw the acts of God and believed in the God of Israel, similar were the Gibenonites.[50] This being an illustration of how other peoples and nations of the world could find blessing through Israel’s God.

As promised, Israel enters the land after forty years of wandering and finally finds rest.[51] There was very little that Joshua and the people had to do other than reap the rewards of victory. The prime example being Jericho, where the collapse of the walls signaled for them to enter the city and ‘take’ it.[52]

The land of Canaan was Israel’s inheritance, promised to their ancestors and given to them by their God in a covenant. Gratitude and praise were expressed by bringing the first fruits of produce to God[53], and obedience to the covenant stipulations.[54]

The only reason the promise has been fulfilled is because God has fought for them. Just as the exodus was marked with God’s hand in bringing them out of slavery so is God’s hand in bringing them into the promise land.[55] It is interesting to note that the Israelites entrance into Canaan is very similar to their exit from Egypt. In the same way that God removed obstacle of the Red Sea for the Israelites to exit Egypt, He stopped the Jordan River so that they could cross on foot.[56]

The Gospel of Jesus Christ

Gospel Living

In the Gospel accounts we see a parallel between Jesus forty days in the wilderness and Israel’s forty years in the desert. The temptations were almost identical, relating to food, protection, and idolatry. But Jesus did not give in to the temptations. Jesus is the new Israel who succeeded where Israel failed.

Remember, in the wilderness the people of Israel were humbled, tested, taught that God was faithful, and shown His provision. God’s feeding them with manna showed His children that they are given nourishment from God. We see Jesus speak of Himself as the true sustaining nourishment from God:

“Truly, truly, I say to you, it was not Moses who gave you the bread from heaven, but my Father gives you the true bread from heaven. For the bread of God is he who comes down from heaven and gives life to the world.”[57]

The writer of Hebrews uses the imagery of Israel’s journey to describe the Christian life. Reflecting on Hebrews 11 Millar writes: “life with God is always a journey, in which people respond to His grace…faith throughout the Bible involves an initial commitment/repentance followed by a lifetime of similar decisions to submit to the sovereign Lord.”[58]

Gospel Obedience

In the narrative of Genesis-Joshua we continually see God’s people disobey, rebel, and doubt God. This problem points to ‘the problem underneath the problem’, human beings are intrinsically sinful and it is inevitable that we will morally fail. But God continually shows grace to the Israelites even when they fail. What we understand now it that the grace which God had shown to Israel in the past would be surpassed by His provision of a lasting solution to the problem of human sin.[59] Man’s sinfulness is what brings condemnation before God, which is revealed by the law and expressed in Israel’s inability to keep the covenant.

“The ultimate function of the law is not to enable obedience, but to expose disobedience, paving the way for the divine intervention which will eventually enable real obedience, and a new intimacy with God Himself.”

Yet Christ was without sin, upholding the law perfectly, and made a new covenant of faith with us. God intervenes for us and makes obedience a real possibility through Christ. In other words, Christ upholds the law and we are righteous through His obedience. Again, Christ is the true and greater Israel to which we are grafted in.[60]

Gospel Relationships

We see God’s grace and its implications of the exodus event in the lives of the Israelites.

“The nation has been redeemed, and now belongs to God. As His unique people, they must submit to Him in worship. He has redeemed them from Egypt to enjoy a relationship with Him, and to do so in His land. They must not treat one another in a way that is incompatible with how He has treated them in redeeming them.”[61]

What we see in this quote is the correlation between Israel’s obedience to worship, the land, and to human relationships.[62] How does this relate to us now? First, the proper response to God’s grace shown in salvation through Jesus Christ should be shown in our everyday life as worship.[63] Next, the land is no longer the locus of God’s relationship with His people, Christ is.[64] In other words, Christ is the promise land through which spiritual nomads find rest and nourishment.[65] Last, in view of the mercy God has shown us in redeeming us from slavery to sin, we extend that same mercy to others.[66]

The Gospel of Salvation

During the wanderings of the second generation of the Israelites we see a beautiful contrast to the gospel of Jesus Christ. They rebelled against God’s directing word and God judged them by sending poisonous snakes among them. In doing this God turned their hearts back to Him for help. The Israelites cried out for mercy and God answered by commanding Moses to make a serpent out of brass and lift it up for the people to see.

The people were only commanded to look at the serpent of brass, and those who did were healed and lived.[67] Jesus said of Himself:

“As Moses lifted up the serpent in the wilderness, so must the Son of Man be lifted up, that whoever believes in him may have eternal life.”

What was Jesus saying? Remember that the brass serpent was an ‘image’ of the curse upon Israel, in brining healing to those who looked at the serpent lifted up God was showing His power over the curse by delivering His people from it. This is profound.

Jesus said, “I, when I am lifted up from the earth, will draw all people to myself.”[68] Jesus was lifted up and exposed on the cross as the one accursed.[69] Just as Paul wrote, “Christ redeemed us from the curse of the law by becoming a curse for us—for it is written, “Cursed is everyone who is hanged on a tree.”[70] See, Jesus bore the curse of sin n the cross for us. “For our sake he made him to be sin who knew no sin, so that in him we might become the righteousness of God.”[71]

Continue reading “Biblical Theology- Part 8: God’s Faithfulness and Israel’s Faithlessness”

Biblical Theology- Part 7: God’s Covenant with Moses

Note: This series comes from the notes of a course I am teaching on Biblical Theology at Calvary Baptist Church. This material is organized similar to Graeme Goldsworthy’s book According to Plan.

Israel’s New Life

Israel was given a new life after God delivered them out of Egypt. The journey[1] from the Red Sea to Mount Sinai takes Israel “through inhospitable country where they immediately learn the faithfulness of God to provide for their needs, even though they murmur their discontent.”[2] Goldsworthy is right in writing that we learn about the ‘quality of the redeemed life’ in this episode. See, as Christians we have been redeemed and we are being redeemed, so we must learn, like the Israelites, to “live by faith and not by sight.”[3] This is a key concept:

“As Abraham did before them, Israel discovers that there is an element of not yet having what is promised. Thus they must look to the future in hope, and live by the promises of God.”

To begin with, the people were led by Moses to the very place where God had spoken from the flaming bush before the exodus event. As Israel reaches Mount Sinai and stands[4] before the living God the first words they hear concern the covenant. Many argue that Israel’s redemption and new life is summed up in Exodus 19:4-6:

  1. God has executed judgment against His enemies, and the enemies of His people. (4a)
  2. God has redeemed His people out of Egypt and reconciled them to Himself. (4b)
  3. If God’s people show faith through obedience they will be God’s treasured possession of all other people groups. (5)
  4. They will exist in a unique relationship to God and represent Him as a kingdom of priests to the whole world. (6)

Early in Genesis Abraham is told that all nations of the world will be blessed through his descendants.[5] We begin to understand how his works here in Exodus 19 when God calls Israel to be a ‘kingdom of priests.’ See, it is the function of a priest to approach God on behalf of others and approach people on behalf of God. Therefore, the blessings of God would overflow through them to the whole world.

The Law – Living as God’s People

One of the things often disputed among thinking Christians is the place of the Old Testament Law in the Christian life.[6] In trying to make sense of the nature and meaning of the law many Christians get bogged down on the details or particulars of the law. What we often fail to see is the context from which the law was given, and thus we fail to overlook the relationship of the law to the grace of God.

When thinking through these issues one must consider the function of the law ‘within Ancient Israel.’ Notice, the very first word at Mount Sinai is a word about grace and redemption; God declares “you yourselves have seen what I did to the Egyptians.”[7] God saved the Israelites while they were totally helpless in slavery to be His people. We must remember that “all the commandments of God’s covenant focus on the heart of covenant relation, the bond between God and His people.”[8]

God was true to His word and now asks Israel to “obey His voice and keep His covenant,” and this thankful and obedient response seems absolutely appropriate. Goldsworthy notes that the same pattern is expressed in the giving of the Ten Commandments when God begins by stating “I am the Lord your God (YHWH), who brought you out of the land of Egypt, out of the house of slavery.”[9]

“He is their God, and He has saved them. On this basis the law is given…the law is given to those who have already experienced the grace of God in salvation, and it [the law] is not the basis upon which they will be saved.”

This was the situation in which the law[10] was given to the Israelites, their status as God’s people had already been established. The privileges of such a relationship would be maintained by obedience to the stipulations. “God’s commandments call His people to acknowledge Him as their Savior and Lord.”[11] Think about it, “to claim to have received the gift of [this relationship] with God while persisting in a life marked by alienation and enmity is clearly nonsense.”[12] The task of obedience was given because they already existed in an undeserved relationship with God, therefore obedience is in response to God’s salvation.

The first stipulation of the Ten Commandments has direct implications on, and is inclusive of, all the commands that follow. ““You shall have no other gods before me.”[13] This is an exclusive claim to sovereign power and rule over the people. So, in the first commandment we see the central principle, from which the other nine flow out of as direct implications.[14] Goldsworthy writes:

“Sinful and ignorant human beings cannot know what this means in every area of life. The Israelites were dependant on God’s revelation for a proper understanding of the appropriate responses to the command.”

In giving His people the law God was expressing what it looks like for the Israelites to live in relationship to the one true God, their king. The laws given are not arbitrary; they “stem from and reflect the character of God and his purpose for mankind in creation.”[15] The purpose of Israel’s obedience was to reflect God’s nature to the world around them. “How Israelites act toward each other is a concrete expression of their devotion to the God of the Exodus.”[16]

  1. Morally these laws reflect the pure relationship dynamics that God built into creation which was disrupted by human sin.
  2. Some of the laws reflected the actual situation of Israel as in their historical experience.
  3. Others seem to relate to certain aspects of Israel’s ritual life.

As a whole these commands include the principles which govern all the laws of God. The implications of upholding or breaking these commands “spread out like ripples in a pond for all other aspects of the Israelites’ lives.”[17]

Now it is important to understand that the law was given at a certain point in history, and it was important at that point for God to detail it out in the way he did. Remember, God has revealed Himself progressively over time. “The Bible sees God’s revelation as progressive, moving through stages until it is completed in Christ.”[18] Redemption from slavery ultimately foreshadows the saving work of Christ. So, while these events contain the ‘structure’ of the gospel they do not reveal the fullness of it yet. “Because the revelation in the exodus is incomplete it requires more detailed exposition of what it means to live as redeemed people. In their spiritual infancy the Israelites needed to be tutored much more directly[19] in holy living.”[20]

The Tabernacle – A Way for God to Dwell with Man

God’s covenant with His people is characterized by the willingness of God fellowship with an undeserving people. The establishment of a covenant with Israel reflects what was intended to be in God’s relationship with Adam and Eve in the Garden of Eden before the fall. In other words, the covenant is an act of love by God to restore His rebellious, sinful, God-denying people back to Himself. But we cannot miss the most important aspect of this transaction.

“How can people who are still sinful approach a Holy God? The Biblical answer is through a go-between, a mediator. Moses is the mediator of God’s saving acts in the exodus, and also of the word of God that interprets the redeemed existence brought about by the saving acts of God in the exodus.”[21]

While Moses served as a mediator for Israel, there was also another means by which God dwelled with His people, namely, through the tabernacle system which God gives His people.[22] God gives Moses the details of the tabernacle and the function of the priests within the tabernacle system.[23] God also gives Moses an intricate description of the construction of the tabernacle.[24] In Leviticus God gives the various sacrifices that are to be performed in the tabernacle system. Simply put, the people are still totally dependant on God for showing them how to live in proper relationship with Him, and God gives them every detail.

The layout of the tabernacle has theological significance. “It provides a graphic expression of the spiritual state of Israel as the covenant and redeemed people who are [still] sinful.”[25] In other words, the tabernacle conveyed a sense of “heavenly order amid earthly chaos.”[26]

  1. Remember, the tabernacle was build to symbolize God’s presence in their midst. A courtyard with a high fence around the tent indicates the separation that sin causes between sinners and a holy God. The courtyard fence has one entrance at one end facing the door of the tent. This presents a ‘double image.’ “On the one hand, there were barriers that [blocked] off God’s holiness; on the other, a way of access was opened by His grace.”[27]
  2. Inside the entrance lies the altar of sacrifice. The shedding of blood gains entrance for the repentant worshiper. “As the first act of the sacrificial ritual, the Israelite lays a hand on the animal to be offered, thereby symbolizing that the animal is going to take his/her place.”[28] The animal’s blood becomes representative of that person. Leviticus 17:11 is an important passage for understanding the importance of blood in the sacrifices. God has provided animal blood, which contains life, so that the atonement might be made for the sins of the Israelites. Blood can serve as an element of atonement because it is the carrier and symbol of life.[29]
  3. The Israelite priest represents the people and can move into the tent on their behalf, but only after cleansing himself in the bath for ritual washing which is before the tent because any contact between holy and unclean would be fatal. The priests’ work at the altar is primarily to ‘atone, or make atonement’[30] on behalf of the people.
  4. Inside the tent are a lampstand, a table, and an altar for burning incense, different instruments symbolizing some aspect of the divine grace God has shown to the Israelites. The far end of the tent is partitioned with a curtain to screen off the glory of the Lord’s presence, and behind this, in a cubic room, is the Ark of the Covenant.[31]

What we see in God’s design for the tabernacle is that God desires to dwell among His people and fellowship with them. Sin separates His people from Him, but God provides a way of reconciliation through sacrifice and the mediation of the priest. The Israelites are shown that the faithful and proper application of the sacrificial system is acceptable before God and works the pardon of sin. This is explicitly seen in Leviticus 1-6 where the sacrificial offerings express reconciliation and restore fellowship with God.[32]

Holy is the Lord

In the Scripture on of the words most often used to describe God is holy. God reveals his holiness in his saving acts, and calls upon those he has saved to be conformed to that standard. “What may appear to us to be rather arbitrary and irrelevant laws of clean and unclean foods[33] are commanded on the basis of the covenant, which is the chief revelation of the character of God.”[34]

For I am the Lord your God. Consecrate yourselves therefore, and be holy, for I am holy…For I am the Lord who brought you up out of the land of Egypt to be your God. You shall therefore be holy, for I am holy.[35]

Simply put, the covenant people of God are to be marked with the character of God as revealed in His word and acts.[36] The law was that which highlighted the nature of the new creation which was being formed around God’s covenant people while they remained within the old, fallen, confused, sinful world. In Leviticus 26 we see a summary of the law.

  1. God has saved Israel because He is faithful to the promises He made to Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob. His promises are irrevocable; God cannot go back on His word. He would be their God, and they would be His people. By redeeming them out of Egypt he has openly declared that they belong to Him.[37]
  2. In His law God informs Israel how this new relationship to God should be expressed in their lives. Their real desire to live according to His word is the indication that they are redeemed. As the redeemed they will know the blessings of the new Eden.[38]
  3. Apostasy will lead to disqualification from the blessings, and the curses will become a reality.[39] But, if they repent and turn back to the Lord, they shall again know the blessings of the covenant.[40] Yet, as the story continues we will see that Israel will always fall short of the glory of God.

The law consistently reminds God’s people of their “inability to achieve God’s standard of holiness and to love him with all their heart, soul, and strength.”[41] So we begin to see that there is the reality of the continuing effects of sin, which is experienced along with the blessings of the covenant. See, the Law expresses God’s holiness and in turn expects perfect obedience from God’s people. In this respect, the law can only condemn. But, God’s purpose was to save His people. So, from the very outset, “it was clear that atonement must be made.”[42]

“It is precisely then that the law also instructs them to avail themselves of the laws of sacrifice as they repent and cast themselves on God’s mercy. Thus they learn that they cannot keep the law only be recognizing their inability to keep it, and by receiving forgiveness of sins and their acceptance with God as a gift.”[43]

Here is the paradox, although the people of Israel had been chosen by God and formally recognized as the people of God, the history of Israel is a history of failure. But God provided a way of salvation through sacrifice because God’s righteous requirements could not be satisfied by human effort.

The Gospel of Jesus Christ

The Gospel and the Law

The giving of the law was, in many ways, an act of re-creation. In the giving of the law God was declaring that the Israelites were to “behave as new-creation beings, conforming themselves to God’s standards”[44] in all areas of life. In the context we learn that:

“The Mosaic Law was seen to be God’s fatherly instruction, and in it he decreed that the people should love God and love their neighbors. There is no doubt that the aim of the law was to establish mutual love relationships. Yet the history of Israel demonstrates that this ideal cannot be achieved without God’s divine intervention.”[45]

As we know from scripture the law could not save the people. In fact, the laws inability to save people was its deficiency.[46] The law not only reflected God’s holiness but also revealed sin in humanity, and even stirred up sin, thus showing the power of sin to enslave.[47] Thus, when one is saved through faith in Jesus Christ they are released from the power of sin and the condemnation of the law.

In salvation we are given new hearts to know and understand God’s order for creation and be committed to brining it about. The spirit of rebellion against the authority and rule of God is replaced by a spirit of obedience. Therefore, internal motivation replaces external constraint.[48]

Jesus came to fulfill all righteousness for us. By faith we receive the gift of Jesus law keeping, which was perfectly achieved on our behalf, and in Him we become the righteousness of God…We uphold[49] the law by turning our backs on our own warped efforts to keep the law and by putting all our confidence and trust in the one who satisfied all the laws demands on our behalf.”[50] So, Jesus did not so much replace the Old Testament law as make explicit its proper application, through Him to the heart and not just external behavior.[51]

The Gospel and the Tabernacle

There is a seven fold instruction to Moses concerning the building of the tabernacle in chapters 25-31. What is significant about this is the sevenfold repetition of the phrase “the Lord said to Moses”, making the connection between the building of the tabernacle and the seven days of creation. In the midst of a fallen world, in exile from the Garden of Eden, God undertakes another act of re-creation in establishing the tabernacle system.[52] The tabernacle is “a piece of holy ground in a world that has lost its way.”[53] Jesus is the reality to which the tabernacle pointed. This is why the Apostle John wrote of Christ’s incarnation in these terms, “And the Word became flesh and dwelt (tabernacle) among us.”[54]

“Jesus embodies more clearly what the Old Testament structures did truly but only partially.”[55] Christ himself is holy and sacred ground in whom God’s glory resides. “The true and abiding Tabernacle is not a tent…but the incarnate Lord.”[56] Jesus is the high priest[57]; Jesus is also the sacrifice for sin.[58] In Christ we are able to “approach God boldly and with full assurance, knowing that the sin question has been dealt with once and for all.”[59] Thus, God dwells with us through the mediation of Christ.

Appendix: Israel’s Law and the Christian

Christian’s disagree on how to answer the question: ‘How does Israel’s law relate to the Christian?’[60] On the surface, this can be a difficult discussion when reading through some of the laws that do not seem to apply to us in our situation in time.[61]

Sometimes people attempt to argue that only the moral aspects of the law are relevant for the Christian life today. In other words, they take the three different types of law given ‘moral, civic, ceremonial, and argue that the civic and ceremonial laws are no longer relevant and can be discarded. But, the old covenant is seen as a distinct unified package with different aspects all working in harmony. These various aspects cannot be unraveled and treated as parts.[62]

We need to acknowledge that the Law of Moses does not “provide a complete and binding guide to Christian morality. But, on the other hand it should not be dismissed as irrelevant.”[63] The reason many people have problems with understanding the law in the context of the Christian faith it simple, they are looking at the rule rather than the principle. In other words, “they take the moral commands and instructions from the Bible and obey them, but they do not go behind the command to see the reasons for them.”[64] So, we are not aiming for right behavior or action by itself, but to understand the purpose or goal behind the rule that calls for right behavior.

While many of the rules in the Bible are applicable today, some are not. Rules that are very particular in nature become inapplicable when the context changes. We must learn to look beyond the rule itself to see the principle behind it, which is still binding. The rules are particular applications of a principle to a specific context. Now, just to be clear I am not arguing that the rules do not matter, because they do, the moral life would be difficult, it not impossible without rules. But, rules are simply appropriate applications of a principle.

We also have to understand the principle behind the rules and how that principle relates to both God’s character and the old covenant context so that we can understand how it applies in our new covenant context.

Jesus argued in Matthew 22: 34-40 that the two greatest commandments were to “love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind”, and to “love your neighbor as yourself.” In many ways these function as the bigger principles[65] by which the rest of the law hangs.[66]

Continue reading “Biblical Theology- Part 7: God’s Covenant with Moses”

Biblical Theology- Part 6: The Exodus

Note: This series comes from the notes of a course I am teaching on Biblical Theology at Calvary Baptist Church. This material is organized similar to Graeme Goldsworthy’s book According to Plan.

As we have seen in Genesis, up to this point it has become very evident that faith in the promises of God is an important theme in the early stages of redemptive history. The first half of the book of Exodus, namely chapters 1-15, focuses on the exodus event. Exodus is not only a story of God’s faithfulness to His covenant, but also “a story of the lengths to which God is willing to go to create for Himself a people”[1] who live in His kingdom. Goldsworthy writes:

“Throughout the Old Testament, possession of the land is presented as a shadow of the future reality of living as God’s people in his kingdom…remember that all of mankind has been outside Eden since the rebellion of Adam and Eve…any revelation of the kingdom of God within the historical framework if the chosen people must take into account of the fact that even the elect are sinners needing redemption. Already this truth has been expressed in Noah’s deliverance from the watery judgment of the whole world. The exodus from Egypt repeats this picture with greater detail and clarity, so that the condition of sinners and the nature of God’s work to deal with this condition remain as the pattern of redemption until the coming of Christ.”[2]

As Goldsworthy reminds us, the Bible is a unit. Not a group of unrelated books and stories.

And the very text of Exodus begins by inviting the reader to understand the story in light of what came before it in Genesis. The very first word in the ancient text of Exodus is the letter waw which is translated ‘and.’[3] So the text of Exodus 1:1 literally reads: “[and] these are the names of the sons of Israel who came to Egypt with Jacob, each with his household.” This verse is essentially a repetition of Genesis 46:8 which announces Israel’s journey to Egypt. Now, the same words are used in Exodus to announce Israel’s departure from Egypt.

Israel’s Captivity

As we enter the book of Exodus we find that the descendants of Israel in Egypt have multiplied and become a great number. In Exodus 1:7 we read that the Israelites have become “fruitful and multiplied greatly”, thus fulfilling the creation mandate given to Adam[4] and Noah.[5]

The new King of Egypt has no regard for Joseph and his previous service, and see’s the Israelites as a threat to the security of the nation. In fear of their number the King makes the Israelites political/social slaves of the state.[6] Again, we the the pattern of circumstances that appear to make the promises of God distant and seemingly impossible.

There is deep theological meaning behind the captivity in Egypt. In Egypt the pharaoh was seen as a “semi-divine being and his rule is understood as a reflection of the power of Egyptian gods. Therefore, by all outward appearances the God of Israel is unable to prevent foreign gods from exercising rule over His chosen people.

Furthermore, Pharaoh orders that all newborn boys be drowned in the Nile River. In light of the creation mandate to “be fruitful and multiply”, Pharaoh should be seen as a direct opponent to God and His purposes. The decree to kill the male children[7] is nothing less than a challenge to God’s creation mandate. In many ways, “the battle in Exodus is between the [one] true God…and the false god Pharaoh who wises the keep God’s people under his own power.”[8] At this point God brings Moses into the story.

Israel’s Savior Moses

Moses is born in the line of Jacob’s descendants in the line of his son Levi.[9] In keeping with the unified theme of the Bible story, the story of Moses birth is told in creation language. Notice two points of correlation:

  1. When Moses is born his mother looks and him and declares that he was ‘good’[10] echoing the refrain in Genesis 1 where God pronounces what He has created as ‘good.’ What this points to is that Moses birth represents the beginning of the birth, the re-creation of the people. Their slavery will end and their savior will bring them into their rest, the Promised Land.
  2. Moses is also set in an ‘ark’[11] at placed in the waters of the Nile.[12] Enns writes of the theological connection here: “Noah and Moses are selected to escape a tragic watery fate. Both are set on an ‘ark’ and are carried to safety on the very water that brings destruction to others.” In other words, they are both re-creation figures. Noah and Moses serve as ‘vehicles’ through whom God creates a new people for His own purposes.

Moses is rescued from Pharaohs command to drown all firstborn males in the Nile by his Hebrew mother and is then adopted by Egyptian princesses. In some ways Moses had ‘dual-citizenship’, he was born into slavery as a Hebrew, he was also an Egyptian prince adopted as a son into the royal family. In some ways Moses’ story can be likened to Joseph’s, “under the sentence of death, he had. Like Joseph before him, been raised up to be a prince in Egypt.”[13] See, Moses is saved from death to show us that the opposing powers against God’s kingdom cannot destroy the chosen one to mediate God’s plan of salvation for His people. God will use Moses as an intermediary between God and the Israelites.

The next significant event happens when Moses is an adult. Moses is taking refuge in Midian, when God called to him out of the burning bush relaying the cries[14] of the Israelites in slavery in Egypt. God speaking to Moses through the fire of His glory begins a new era in God’s plan of salvation. “The people could not deliver themselves. Their cause was hopeless; they were helpless in the power of the Egyptian empire. Further, the promises of God were such that only He could fulfill them.”[15] Therefore God calls Moses to the burning bush not only to reveal Himself in a personal way [by His name], but to commission Moses to act in His name.

Therefore, Moses is the chosen[16] human instrument through which God will act to bring His people out of slavery.[17] In fact, God commands Moses to confront Pharaoh and to lead the Israelites out of Egypt. What we must remember is that God is working through Moses to bring about His purposes. So ultimately it is God’s power that secures the Israelites freedom.

“It is vital that we understand the place given to certain key figures, such as Moses, [and the people of Israel] in [the] Old Testament…Their significance is not primarily in the way they stand as examples of godliness and faith, but rather in the role they play in revealing and foreshadowing the nature and work of Christ.”[18]

In fact, the portrayal of Moses leadership focuses on his weaknesses as well as his strengths. Moses has some reluctance based on his feeling of inadequacy to perform the task set before him.[19] One example being that he is slow of speech, or not a fluent communicator.[20] Furthermore, Moses has doubts that the people will believe that he is ‘God’s chosen.’[21] Goldsworthy[22] points out that God reassures him on two grounds;

  1. He will identify the God who has spoken to him as “I AM” and as the God of their fathers.[23] He is “I AM,” the God who is declaring His lordship in a very personal way. He is the personal God, who may be addressed by name. God is the “I AM” who determines His own purposes of mercy.[24]
  2. Moses is granted some miraculous signs and wonders, which he will be able to repeat in order to persuade the Israelites of his mission.[25] Later we see that the ten plagues that God performs through Moses demonstrate that the God’s of Egypt are powerless. These signs and wonders also function to show the God of Israel as the one true God.[26]

The Covenant in Action

While Moses’ brother Aaron, and the people become convinced of Moses’ God given task[27], after Moses demands their release, Pharaoh denies the command and imposes harder conditions on the people. At this point the Israelites become very restless[28], and God responds with these words of promise;

“Now you shall see what I will do to Pharaoh; for with a strong hand he will send them out, and with a strong hand he will drive them out of his land. I am the Lord. I appeared to Abraham, to Isaac, and to Jacob, as God Almighty, but by my name the Lord [YHWH] I did not make myself known to them. I also established my covenant with them to give them the land of Canaan, the land in which they lived as sojourners. Moreover, I have heard the groaning of the people of Israel whom the Egyptians hold as slaves, and I have remembered my covenant. Say therefore to the people of Israel, ‘I am the Lord, and I will bring you out from under the burdens of the Egyptians, and I will deliver you from slavery to them, and I will redeem you with an outstretched arm and with great acts of judgment. I will take you to be my people, and I will be your God, and you shall know that I am the Lord your God, who has brought you out from under the burdens of the Egyptians. I will bring you into the land that I swore to give to Abraham, to Isaac, and to Jacob. I will give it to you for a possession. I am the Lord.[29]

Notice the use of God’s personal name YHWH here. Goldsworthy notes, “at some time in their history the Israelites ceased to pronounce the holy name YHWH…The important thing [here] is that this is the personal name of God, and it is linked to his character as the God who makes the gracious commitment of Himself to His people, and who is revealing what it means for Him to be faithful to that commitment.”[30]

God’s Providential Sovereignty

Through all the plagues Pharaoh is persistent in refusing to let the Israelites go. Notice why. The writer mentions three ways in which Pharaoh’s heart is hardened:

  1. God hardens Pharaohs heart.[31]
  2. Pharaoh hardens his own heart.[32]
  3. At all other points the writer simply states that “the heart of Pharaoh was hardened.”

From the text we can clearly say that Pharaoh’s hardening of his heart was deliberate, and he is held responsible. At the same time we must also affirm that God is sovereign over all things. Apparently many have a problem with these passages, namely that God hardens Pharaoh’s heart. I think Goldsworthy puts it well when he argues that the Biblical perspective teaches that “human responsibility and God’s sovereignty are somehow intertwined without being in any way compromised.” This is something we must accept even though we will never fully understand the multi-dimensional ‘particulars’ of ‘how’ this plays out in each situation. It is clear in the Bible, God is sovereign and man is responsible for the decisions he makes.

The Passover

In Exodus we see Israel referred to as the son of God for the first time.[33] This intimately identifies them as God’s covenant people because they are known by His name.[34] Also, when Pharaoh refuses to release Israel (God’s son) then God threatens the death of Pharaoh’s firstborn son.[35] Not only that, but God threatens to wipe out every first born in Egypt.[36] Notice, this also includes Israel as ‘being in Egypt.’

“Israel’s involvement with the tenth plague is an important part of God’s revelation of the kingdom. Unless they believe God and follow his directions all the firstborn of Israel will also die.”[37]

Therefore, as commanded by God, on a specified day a year old male lamb without blemish is taken into each Israelite home. Four days later the lamb is to be slaughtered, and its blood is to be spread on the doorpost of each home. The flesh is to be roasted and eaten with unleavened bread. Also, each person in the home is to be dressed as if they were ready to go on a journey. On that night the Lord will execute judgment “on all the gods of Egypt.”[38] When the blood covers the doorpost God’s judgment will pass and death will not befall the firstborn of that home. Clowney makes a few important observations here:[39]

  1. The first born son is significant because they served as a representative of the family. Therefore, the infliction of judgment on the first born would represent the penalty of death to all in the family.
  2. The lamb died in the place of the first born son, and therefore also in the place of all those represented by the firstborn.
  3. Their partaking, or eating, of the lamb marked their restored fellowship with God that comes through the atonement God provides.

In remembrance of this occasion God instructs Moses to establish the feast of the Passover.[40] Goldsworthy argues that this command to establish a memorial shows how important the Passover is in patterning the redemptive work of God. He writes, “we can safely infer that the lamb’s blood somehow covered the believing and therefore obedient Israelites so that they suffered no judgment.”[41]

Israel’s Redemption

“As we reflect on the elements of redemption revealed in the exodus event, we are able to see why God led Joseph and his brothers to Egypt.”[42] Israel’s presence in Egypt is not the product of a random sequence of events; God has purposes in all He does. See, Exodus is not only the continuation of a past story, it is also the beginning of a new one.”[43] Redemption is always an act of re-creation. In fact, the language that the writer uses is the plagues and the parting of the Red Sea is very reminiscent of the creation narrative.

While the ten plagues cause much hardship for the Egyptians, in many ways they are probation. “They demonstrate and prove the forbearance of God who delays wrath and offers every chance to repent and obey, and the justice of God who, when every probationary exercise has failed, finally inflicts the wrath that is deserved.”[44]

The last straw is seen when God delivers the Israelites from the armies of Pharaoh at the crossing of the Red Sea.[45] In this event we see God harden Pharaoh’s heart again so that His power may be demonstrated and His purposes might be achieved.[46] We also see God unleash His creative forces against the enemies of His people, and therefore His enemies.

Against a seemingly never ending struggle the people of God are reminded through Moses ““Fear not, stand firm, and see the salvation of the Lord, which he will work for you today. For the Egyptians whom you see today, you shall never see again. The Lord will fight for you, and you have only to be silent.”

God’s word is proven true again, the waters are driven back so that the Israelites walk to freedom and the waters close over Pharaoh’s armies stopping them dead in their tracks. See, the parting of the Red Sea should be seen as an act of re-creation in light of Genesis 1:9 where the seas come together and separate themselves from dry land. In Exodus 14 the seas are opened to expose the dry land beneath. Remember, the dry land is the dwelling of many creatures, a place that supports life.[47] In Exodus the act of creation is reversed against the Egyptians and the waters crash over the land bringing death.[48] “This is also direct retribution for Pharaoh’s attempt to kill the Israelite firstborn in the waters of the Nile. Just as Pharaoh attempted to destroy the Israelites, by water, so God now destroys the Egyptians.”[49] Also, the Israelites pass through the water on dry ground as they head to a new life redeemed from slavery.

The Gospel of Jesus Christ

The dimensions of redemption that are revealed in Exodus provide a beautiful pattern for understanding the Gospel of Jesus Christ. Take notice of a few patterns;

1. Redemption

Israel’s slavery is contrary to the covenant promises made to Abraham, Issac, and Jacob, the fathers of the nation. It is on the basis of these promises, and nothing else, that God will show His faithfulness by redeeming His people out of slavery.[50] “Redemption is God’s act of judgment upon His enemies whereby He retrieves His lost people and makes them His[51]…It is thus a supernatural act of salvation worked by God out of love[52] for a people powerless to help themselves.[53]

2. Sacrifice

Intimately tied to these events is the slaying of a Passover lamb, which delivers Israel from judgment so that they may live and go free. We understand that Jesus Christ is our lamb, who takes away the sin of the world. “He is our Passover, sacrificed for us. Our meal of fellowship with God is His communion feast.” In fact, Jesus death is called an exodus (departure) in Luke 9:31 indicating the inauguration of a new Exodus.

3. Freedom and Faith

Once the people are free, and they understand what God has done on their behalf[54], there is deep motivation to trust God and obey Him. Rightly so, the exodus event leads to freedom, faith, and celebration. This is expressed in a spontaneous act of worship[55] centered on telling what God has done, pointing to His faithfulness.[56] We see a beautiful pattern of song from Moses in Exodus 15, part of it which proclaims:

“The Lord is my strength and my song,
and he has become my salvation;
this is my God, and I will praise him,”[57]

“Redemption as a release from slavery or from a position of misfortune now becomes one of the most significant themes in the Bible.”[58] The exodus of God’s people here points to something much greater. Namely, Jesus Christ who is the true and greater Moses who has come to “bring His people out of slavery far worse than that imposed by Egypt – a slavery to sin and death. And by His death and resurrection He has defeated an anti-God figure much more heinous than a mere human pharaoh – Satan himself.”[59]

The Good News is that the required blood of a sacrifice to set things back to how they should be has been shed. We must rest in the confidence that the Church’s Exodus is complete in Christ, and that in Christ we have truly entered the Promised Land.

Continue reading “Biblical Theology- Part 6: The Exodus”

Biblical Theology- Part 5: God’s Covenant with Abraham

Note: This series comes from the notes of a course I am teaching on Biblical Theology at Calvary Baptist Church. This material is organized similar to Graeme Goldsworthy’s book According to Plan.

By faith Abraham obeyed when he was called to go out to a place that he was to receive as an inheritance. And he went out, not knowing where he was going. [1]

“The figure of Abraham, or Abram as he is initially known, dominates the book of Genesis and casts a shadow that extends across the whole Bible.”[2] In fact, after chapter 11 the rest of Genesis deals with four generations of one family: Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, and Joseph. As we will see, the members of this lineage had a significant role in the plan of God for human redemption.

God progresses his purposes of redemption in “his call of Abraham to found a new nation.”[3] In fact, “all of world history is related to the promises that God makes to Abraham. “The prime motive behind the call of Abraham is God’s intention to bless humanity and reverse the disastrous consequences of Adam and Eve’s rebellion in the Garden of Eden.”[4] The final meaning of history will be found in the person of Jesus, a descendant of Abraham.”[5]

Abraham

First and foremost we must establish a foundational understanding of how God chooses to work. God does not begin with working on Abraham as if he were a ‘subject for reform.’ He begins with giving a promise. So the focus is not on what Abraham has to do for God, but what God will do for Abraham. Then, in response to this, faith that changes the inner and outer life is cultivated. This is central to understanding the absolute sovereignty of God in accomplishing the things He has promised.

It is with this foundation of a ‘promise giving God’ that we understand why, in obedience to God, Abram left his home in Haran and traveled to Canaan with his nephew Lot and their families plus households. Abram learns to live by faith in the promises of God against the background of events that seem to threaten the fulfillment of those very promises. But God appears to Abram and establishes a covenant with him. It is at this crucial point that:

“God changes the name of the patriarch from Abram[6] to Abraham[7], thus signifying a prominent aspect of the covenant: Abraham will be the father of many nations. At the same time[8] God indicates that the covenant is signed with the sign of circumcision.[9] This mark in the flesh of every Hebrew child is to signify the special relationship that the covenant established between God and His people.”[10]

This is a significant shift in the narrative drama of the Bible story. It is interesting to note that “God’s desire to bless Abraham, and through him bless others stands in sharp contrast to the events described in Genesis 3. Whereas these earlier chapters are dominated by the effects of divine punishment as a result of human disobedience, the Abraham narrative emphasizes the theme of divine blessing.”[11]

Notice that directly after the account of Babel the author places the genealogy of Shem’s Descendants[12] before the narrative of Abraham. Remember that Shem was the son that Noah blessed and declared that Canaan (the land God promised to Abraham) would be his servant. Shem’s[13] lineage is traced to Abraham, whom God promises to ‘make his name great’[14] through a covenant promise. The author of Genesis places the genealogy in-between these accounts so that the reader would consider the importance of this promise to Abraham compared to the narrative of Babel. God promised to ‘make Abraham’s name great’, this stands in direct contrast to the people of Babel, who desired ‘to make a great name for themselves’ apart from God.

In establishing His covenant with Abraham God promises to make his name great. Goldsworthy[15] presents the covenant as fourfold, showing that the objective action of God’s blessing was interlinked with the following promises:

  1. God will give Abraham many descendants, who will become a great nation.[16]
  2. Abraham’s descendants will possess the promised land of Canaan.[17]
  3. God will be their God.[18]
  4. Through Abraham’s descendants all Nations of the World will be blessed.[19]

What is striking and points to the absolute sovereignty of God is that the fulfillment of these promises is not within the control of man, nor is it simply a matter of natural events. As you follow the narrative it becomes apparent that fulfillment can only be achieved by the supernatural work of God. Circumstances exist or develop which threaten the fulfillment of these promises.

  1. God calls Abraham to leave the security of his home in Haran and become a nomad towards a foreign land, not knowing where he was going.
  2. The land God promised was under the possession of the Canaanites.
  3. Sarah is barren, which is a major source of doubt that Abraham’s family line will actually be continued.
  4. Sarah is almost taken as a wife by Pharaoh. If she had remained there, Abraham could have never has the child of promise.
  5. When Abraham and Lot settle in Canaan they are forced to split because their flocks and herds are too large.
  6. When Abraham and Sarah was very old, and beyond their childbearing years they were still childless.

It was “at critical times [like these] during that period God reminds[20] Abraham of his promises to sustain him in the face of seemingly impossible odds against their coming true.”[21] This is seen most fully when God makes an oath with Abraham in the ceremony of walking through the divided parts of an animal sacrifice. In essence God is declaring “if I do not keep the oath that I swear, may I be divided as this animal has been.”[22][23] God swears to Abraham by His own life that He will do what He has promised.

Themes in the Life of Abraham

1. Grace

There was nothing special about Abraham that made him deserving of God calling him into these blessings. We know nothing of Abraham’s faith before God calls him. So it is not as if God is responding to Abrahams obedience, more properly Abraham is responding to God’s grace.

Remember, Abraham is not perfect. On many occasions we see him either lie to preserve his life,[24] or take hard situations into his own hands in doubt of God’s promise.

  1. He lied and said that Sarah was his sister so that Pharaoh would not murder him in order to have Sarah as a harem.[25] In doing this Abraham puts his wife Sarah at risk and shows a lack of faith in God’s promises. He does the same thing later to Abimelech, the Canaanite King.[26]
  2. Abraham also attempted to have a son by Hagar, his wife’s chief servant.[27] This was an act contrary to God’s promise that he would bear a child with Sarah.[28]

The author of Genesis wants us to know “in recounting these sins…that Abraham was a fallible person.”[29] In other words, grace shows us that “whenever God acts for the good of the people, he is acting against what they deserve as rebellious sinners.”[30] God’s grace shown to Abraham[31] is important because it was the basis for all the other blessings God promised and gave to him.

2. Election

Election means that God chooses to show His grace to certain people. “It is no use in asking why we find a godly line and a godless line in the early chapters of Genesis, or why Noah and not someone else finds grace, or why Abraham and not some other person is chosen to be the father of a blessed race.”[32] What we can say is that these actions are in accordance with His plan, demonstrate His sovereignty, and are done for His glory.[33] Vos writes about Abraham and his descendants, “here one family is taken out of the number of existing families, and with it, within it, the redemptive, revelatory work of God is carried forward.”[34]

3. Faith

“Abrahams faith is certainly not perfect, not always strong, and sometimes boarders on disbelief. Yet at the crucial times he takes God at His word and believes in his promises.”[35] In fact, “from beginning to end, faith expressed in obedience is the hallmark of Abraham’s relationship with the Lord.”[36]

Abraham learns that God is absolutely faithful to His word, and is thus reliable to follow through. Since Abraham deserves nothing that is promised to him, it is all seen as unmerited gift. This is why Abraham is counted as righteous before God by simply believing His word.[37] The focus is not on the reliability and strength of Abraham’s faith, but on the reliability and strength of God’s word.

Obedience is motivated by faith in the promises of God. We see this in the life of Abraham who lives in obedience that comes from faith, which is “obedience motivated by Abraham’s confidence that what God had promised, he would do. And in such obedience God receives all the glory.”[38]

Abraham’s Son Isaac

Abraham had tried to get around being childless by taking matters into his own hands and producing children[39] through the servant Hagar, and others, but Isaac is God’s chosen. Isaac is the promised child of God, born when Abraham is one hundred years old and fully incapable of conceiving by natural means. “Isaac is a gift of grace, and his birth to extremely aged parents signifies the supernatural element in the birth of the covenant people. Against all odds God is shown to be absolutely faithful to his promises.”[40]

“The most significant challenge to Abrahams trust in the God of the covenant comes with the demand that he offer the boy as a sacrifice.[41] Clowney makes an important observation here:

“We must remember that God did not ask him to murder his son, but to offer him as a sacrifice. The difference is important. In the Old Testament, it is evident that the lives of all sinful men are forfeit before God; God can require the death of any sinner. Further, the demand of God’s judgment is directed against the firstborn as the representative[42] of all [in the family].”[43]

See, God can and must require of Abraham not only the dedication of all that he has and is, but also the full satisfaction due to God’s holy justice. For Abraham, “to trust in God means to look to Him alone, to find in Him all our hope, to hold nothing back, no reserve.”[44] If Isaac dies, how can the promises of God be fulfilled through him?”[45]

We learn in the narrative that Isaac does not die. While the cost of redemption was total, what God required He also provided. We see that God provides a substitute in the form of a ram caught in a bush. This was to show Abraham by symbol that God would pay the price of redemption. This becomes clear as the Bible story unfolds. We see that God did what Abraham did not have to do: He made His Son an offering for sin.

The promise to Abraham now rests on Isaac. So, Isaac is shown to be the descendant of Abraham through whom the promises of God will be fulfilled. His birth, and life illustrates the faithfulness of God to those promises.

Abraham’s Grandson Jacob

Isaac’s wife Rebekah is infertile, but God grants them the ability to have children when Isaac is sixty years old.[46] Again, the conception and birth of their twins Jacob and Esau is supernatural just as their father Isaacs was.

“Before their birth the two struggle in the womb, and God tells Rebekah that they will be fathers of two nations, and the older shall serve the younger. Esau is the first to be born, but it is soon clear that the other, Jacob, is the one chosen by God.”[47]

Now, Esau “despised” his birthright. While Jacob may be criticized for exploiting his brother’s dismissive attitude towards being the first born, it is true that Esau was indifferent and did not care about the importance of his birthright. So, Jacob deceives his feeble and nearly blind father Isaac, tricking him into giving him the blessing that belonged to Esau. “If there is any doubt that God will confirm this arrangement it is soon dispelled.”[48] On Jacobs way out of the Promised Land to find a wife God speaks to Jacob in a dream affirming that all the promises of Abraham belong to him.

Once Jacob enters into Mesopotamia he meets his cousin Rachel and wises to marry her. Rachel’s father Laben employs Jacob for seven years to earn the hand of his daughter. Once the seven years is up Laben gives Jacob Rachel’s older sister Leah instead. Therefore Jacob must work seven more years to earn the hand of Rachel. This trial is nothing more than another challenge to the fulfillment of God’s covenant promises, but God is with Jacob, and eventually Jacob leaves the employment of Laben and returns to Canaan. If anything, it becomes “quite clear that Jacob’s election is grace and not what he deserves.”[49]

Upon returning to Canaan Jacob prepares for a confrontation with his brother Esau. “He is armed only with the promises of God[50].”[51] Yet it is not Esau who confronts Jacob but an ‘unnamed man’ who is a messenger of God.[52] Jacob wrestles with this man who appears to be hindering his return to the Promise Land.

“The last thing Jacob expects, as this point in his life, is to find that God is his [opponent.] He is deeply afraid of his brother Esau, because of his theft of Isaac’s blessing years before, and is doing his best to show Esau his deep repentance[53]…Why does God suddenly…wrestle him into submission?…God has been wrestling with him throughout the story[54], ever since he obtained the blessing by trickery. Now, at last he is seeking it the right way, as a gift from God with desperate determination[55]…He recognizes that his [opponent] has something he wants, something that he can receive only as a gift.”[56]

What we see is that God’s fourteen year strategy with Jacob climaxes in this wrestling match. The point was to develop Jacob the self sufficient schemer into the man who is totally dependant on God.[57] See, Jacob was consumed with a desire for blessing, for which he was willing to sacrifice his fathers respect, lose his place in the family, and incur his brother’s hatred. It is not until this wrestling match that Jacob abandons his own resources, and clings with desperation to his God.

The blessing is granted and Jacobs name is changed to Israel, signifying that he ‘has struggled with God.’[58] From that point on Jacob was a different man, a godly patriarch. God’s hand is on Jacob, “as to confirm this, he is received by Esau” and “his name is linked to the covenant promises. Thus God is known as the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob[59].”[60]

This is the paradox, while God is the enemy of His people, opposing them in sin, He is also their savior, granting blessing to them. Ultimately we see this culminate in the cross where Christ defeats sin and judges wickedness, while also extending blessing to all who are dependant on Him for salvation through faith.

Abraham’s Great Grandson Joseph

The covenant established with Abraham is reaffirmed and developed with each of the succeeding generations. God continues this process with Joseph the eleventh son born to Jacob and Rachel.[61] Because of envy his brothers sell him into slavery to the Ishmaelite traders, who in turn deliver him to an official in Egypt. “He is jailed on false charges but released some time later as he interprets the Pharaoh’s dreams.”[62] Joseph rises in power and is later reconciled with his brothers. The significance of this episode is heard in Joseph’s words to his brothers: “As for you, you meant evil against me, but God meant it for good, to bring it about that many people should be kept alive, as they are today.”[63] Josephs dependence on God is notable:

“He regards the action of God within the destructive, sinful behavior of the brothers as decisive. It is surly this liberating perspective that saves Joseph from [surrendering] to temptations such as anger, resentment, and bitterness.”[64]

In the same way that Joseph trusted in God’s saving presence, and redemptive purposes in the midst of trial so did Christ in the shadow of the cross. Jesus, the true and greater Joseph, chose the path of reconciliation rather than retribution. Joseph serves as a great reminder to look beyond the present circumstances in trust that God is providentially in control of redemptive history.

The Death of Jacob

After the reunion of Joseph with his family it becomes time for Jacob’s death. Before he dies two significant events take place. Goldsworthy describes them as follows:

  1. Jacob accepts two sons of Joseph as his own, Ephraim and Manasseh.[65] He makes them heads of ‘half-tribes’ which numbers them with the tribes of Israel. Jacob makes it clear that this adoption is integral to the fulfillment of the covenant promises.[66] Jacob also places his blessing on the head of Ephraim the younger.[67]
  2. Jacob then gathers his twelve sons and makes a prophetic blessing on each one of them. Above all Jacob declares a special blessing on Judah by declaring: “The scepter shall not depart from Judah, nor the ruler’s staff from between his feet.”[68] “Out of Judah (the Jews) would come David and his royal line leading eventually to Jesus of Nazareth[69]

The Gospel of Jesus Christ

We know that the divine promises made to Abraham ultimately find their fulfillment in Jesus Christ. There are certain things we can reflect on about the narrative of Abraham’s family that would encourage our trust in God.

1. Forgiveness

The calling of Abraham is foundational to the remainder of redemption history since the covenant established with him “provides the baseline along which God brings to pass the crucial steps in completing His plan for the world.”[70]

“God credited [Abraham] as righteous while he was sinful so that God could proceed with the work of imparting the great blessings he had promised to Abraham and his seed.”[71] So Abraham was forgiven, despite his continual falling short of sinlessness.[72]

The object of the Christian’s faith is the same as Abrahams. Both believe in the promise of forgiveness and redemption through the promised seed, Jesus Christ.

2. Faith

Paul[73] describes the faith of Abraham in these terms: “In hope he believed against hope… He was fully convinced that God was able to do what he had promised.” Abrahams faith is an example of “assurance of things hoped for, the conviction of things not seen.”[74]

Fuller is right when he argues: “we need to emulate this man who, against the darkness of visible circumstances, nevertheless rejoiced in the way God would (has) glorify himself” in the promise of the Christ.[75] We have a much greater encouragement to trust God’s promises than did Abraham, who had no idea how God would fulfill His promises.[76] So, the Divine promises of Abraham anticipate the coming of a royal descendant who will impart God’s blessing to all the nations of the earth.

Abraham was justified by faith and his obedient actions were visible expressions of this inner faith. This is faith’s power to motivate obedience. Abraham obeyed because he believed God. See, “genuine faith carries with it the power to do righteous works.”[77][78]

3. Fulfillment

In Genesis 17:5 we read that Abraham would become the “the father of a multitude of nations.” So, the seed of Abraham extends beyond the boundaries of physical descendants. Essentially, the account of Abraham in Genesis clears the way for him to become the father of those from “every tribe and language and people and nation.”[79] Just as it was with Abraham, “what is decisive in making men and woman the true seed of Abraham is God’s work.”[80] There was nothing in Abraham himself that qualified Him to receive God’s call and blessing, so it is with us. Fuller rightly highlights the fact that:

“The attainment of this great blessing comes not through the flesh but through God’s purpose; not through works but through God’s purpose and calling.”[81] Since no one possesses any distinctive[82] that brings about God’s calling, the riches of His grace are available to anyone[83] who calls upon Him for mercy.

This is why Paul argues in Galatians 3:28-29 that “there is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither slave nor free, there is no male and female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus. And if you are Christ’s, then you are Abraham’s offspring, heirs according to promise.” So, God Himself would be the inheritance and portion of Abram and his seed.

Continue reading “Biblical Theology- Part 5: God’s Covenant with Abraham”

Biblical Theology- Part 4: God’s Covenant with Noah

Note: This series comes from the notes of a course I am teaching on Biblical Theology at Calvary Baptist Church. This material is organized similar to Graeme Goldsworthy’s book According to Plan.

In the first chapters of Genesis we see the beginnings of human history through the theological lens of God’s plan. When God created the world and declared it good and He was committed to the well being of His creation according to His purpose.

God’s care for creation becomes evident as redemptive history moves forward. “Without exception, the whole human race is involved in wickedness, outwardly and inwardly; equally without exception the whole race has excited divine grief and pain; and, once more…are under the judgment of death.”[1] Since man is head of creation, then all of creation would share in God’s judgment also.

But hope is not completely lost. We must remember that God has a plan, which includes commitment to His creation for the purposes of His will. Goldsworthy illustrates God’s commitment to creation by noting: “Mankind’s rebellion brings judgment but not instant destruction. God preserves order in the universe and in human society, and at the same time begins to reveal His purposes to overcome the effects of human sin.”[2]

As we have already seen, through Adam and Eve God maintains the seed of the woman in Seth. The Sethites are shown to worship God by calling on His name.[3] What is the significance of this? According to Goldsworthy: “To call on God’s name means to express trust and confidence in the God who has revealed his character…[4] it means to believe God for salvation.”[5]

While the line of Seth was in one sense godly, they were also sinful by virtue of the fall.[6] Yet God maintained the seed of woman through Seth. The writer of the Pentateuch arranges the material in Genesis 5 in order for the reader to see the direct link ‘from Adam to Seth to Noah.’[7]

“Descended from Adam through Seth, Noah belongs to the special line which later includes the Hebrew patriarchs, Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob. This family line is characterized by individuals who play an important role in the outworking of God’s purposes to bring about the restoration of creation following the punishment of Adam and Eve in the Garden of Eden.”[8]

Yet, Noah has a specific function in this family line. The very name Noah means ‘to comfort.’ In many ways Noah’s name reflects the purpose of his life[9], “to bring comfort to humanity after the cursing of the ground and the difficulties of obtaining a living from the land.”[10]

Introducing the Themes of Grace and Covenant

In Genesis 6-9 we are introduced to two themes that will be central in the whole story of redemption found in the Bible. Those themes/words are ‘grace’ and ‘covenant.’

a. Grace (Genesis 6:8-9)

God was provoked to anger and had enough of the wicked human race. But Noah finds grace in the eyes of God.[11] The Hebrew phrase ‘Noah found grace in the eyes of God’ means nothing more than ‘God favored him.’ “The emphasis on the ‘righteousness’ of Noah is set against the contrast to the wickedness”[12] of his descendants. In comparison to the wickedness of those around him, we must see that Noah’s ‘righteousness’[13] as the consequence of God’s grace. The Hebrew rendering of Genesis 6:8-9 (taken together) show that God’s grace ‘brought forth’ Noah’s righteousness.

Here the significance of the phrase lies in what God does for Noah, “He rescues him.”[14] Therefore, grace is shown as God being good towards those who do not deserve it. So ‘grace’ is not grounded in perceived obligation or contract, nor can it be coerced. Therefore, ‘Grace’ as a “characteristic of God grounds divine-human relations in God’s generous initiative…in the restorative activity of God on behalf of humanity.”[15]

Because God chose to exhibit His grace to Noah, he lives by faith in God’s word. The most obvious example of this is the enormous boat Noah built on faith that God would flood the entire earth.[16] This is also evident in the fact that after the flood “Noah is patient in leaving the ark, not on the basis of the evidence of his eyes[17], but only when the divine word[18] was given.”[19]

“Noah’s righteousness is simply stated alongside God’s grace without any comment about whether it is the cause or effect of God’s attitude toward him.”[20] We must continually remind ourselves that God’s graciousness is thus neither rooted in nor dependant on people. God is sovereign in his giving of grace.[21]

b. Covenant (6:18)

A covenant underpins God’s relationship with Noah. God shows Noah how to escape the flood by proclaiming, “I will establish my covenant with you, and you shall come into the ark.” This is the first time a covenant is mentioned in the Biblical text. We know that from this point on ‘covenants’ will play a major role in the history of redemption. In fact, the covenant concept is one of the most important motifs in biblical theology.

As the Biblical drama unfolds we will later see that the word covenant is used to describe God’s loving relationship with His undeserving chosen people. In the ordinary sense of the word a covenant is “the coming into existence of a stated[22] and continuing relationship between two parties who were previously apart from each other.”[23] For now, our focus will remain on God’s covenant with Noah.

Noah and the Covenant

Remember, in order to protect the ‘seed of woman’ God made a covenant to save Noah and his family from the destruction of the flood. Though Noah and his family are not saved in an eternal sense[24], this covenant at the very least points to, or provides a pattern for, the future covenant of salvation through it has not at that point been revealed.

Again, Noah and his family show their faith by trusting God’s word. They are protected as they live in their ‘little floating world’ while God executes judgment on the rest of creation. Goldsworthy writes: “when they disembark into a new world God promises that even though mankind, including Noah, is still inclined to evil[25], God will never again destroy the world in a flood.

So, “God makes the first move and establishes a relationship that works for the good of creation. He calls it ‘my covenant’…God is refusing to allow human rebellion to divert Him from His purpose to create a people to be His people.”[26]

The sign of the covenant made with Noah was God’s ‘bow in the clouds.’[27] “While this visible symbol in the sky would undoubtedly reassure humankind, its express intent was to remind God Himself to keep His covenantal promise, although the reminder may be just an anthropomorphic[28] way of expressing the reassurance.”[29] The bow is the “bearer of eternal truth”[30] to man. Man can be certain of its changeless meaning and rest in faith that God will keep His word. Simply put, “covenant signs express covenant promises to covenant people.”[31]

God then calls Noah[32] to fill the earth and exercise dominion just as He had commanded Adam.”[33] Once the flood waters subside, Noah and his family become the ‘new beginning’ of the human race.[34] Notice, the first thing Noah did upon leaving the Ark was to build an altar and worship God. This is the only proper response to the grace shown by God to Noah and his family in saving them from death by flood.

Furthermore, God makes other provisions for the protection of the ‘seed of woman.’ In Genesis 9:5-6 God deters the violent acts of men by establishing the “life for life” legal enactment. Thus, humans are forbidden to take human life.[35] The Lord gives life and only the Lord has the right to take life away. Remember, humans are created in the ‘image of God’ and are God’s agents in the world. Therefore, God will call to account anyone who kills His agent.[36] As implication Fuller makes two observations:

  1. In establishing this primitive structure of government God assures that never again would the Cainite-minded people[37] be able to completely overwhelm God’s people.[38]
  2. Also, no longer would Noah’s descendants, in order to have some hope of safety, have to resort to the desperate measure of making marriage alliances with serpent-types[39] at the cost of having offspring adopt their violent lifestyle.[40]

Along with the God ordained protection of humanity, the command to “Be fruitful, multiply, and fill the earth”[41] is repeated to Noah and his family. From here we can conclude that God’s sovereign purposes for redemption history have remained unaltered.

Gods Purposes and the Division of the Human Race

The rapid development of sin is a central theme in the early narrative of Genesis. Sin proves powerful enough to distort the ‘good creation’ of God and can be rendered for the purposes of evil. “Because the evil is so deep-seated” the judgment of the flood, nor human government cannot cure it. Therefore other means are resorted to.”[42]

Not only did God protect the seed of woman and progress His purposes by establishing His covenant and human government, a further step was taken by fragmentizing humankind. “Genesis 10 gives a table of the nations[43] that stemmed from Noah’s[44] three sons, Shem, Ham, and Japheth.”[45] These descendants spread out over the earth after the flood, thus bringing to fulfillment God’s command to ‘fill the earth.’[46] But the people did not do this on their own accord, as we will see God brought it about by His providential hand.

a. Noah Declares Blessing and Curse

In Genesis 9 we see that Noah became a man of the soil and planted a vineyard. We are told that Noah becomes drunk off of his own wine and lies uncovered alone inside his tent. Ham unashamedly looks upon his father’s nakedness, then humiliates and dishonors him by attempting to make a spectacle of the situation by calling his brothers to join in. Because of the disrespect Noah pronounces a curse on Ham’s son, and thus on him.

Therefore, Noah creates a new division in the human race stemming from the blessing and curse he pronounced on his sons: Ham’s son Canaan is cursed, Shem is blessed, and Japheth shares in Shem’s blessing.[47]

This had direct implications on all the nations that descended from Noah and his family.[48] Therefore, the genealogies[49] in Genesis 10 stem from the prophetic word of Noah declaring blessing and cursing on his sons. The significance of the divisions will become clear as redemptive history moves forward. One example, Noah’s curse on Canaan looks forward to the promised rule of Israel over the land of Canaan.

b. The Tower of Babel

It’s important to note that the nations descended from Noah listed in Genesis 10 was after, and thus the result of the confusion of tongues from the Tower of Babel in Genesis 11.[50] Then why is the account of Babel listed after the generations? The author of Genesis chose to break the chronology of the narrative “by first listing the many nations throughout the earth…and then recount the situation that made it necessary for God to bring this about.”[51] By locating the table of nations in between the flood and Babel the author emphasizes the importance of God’s command to ‘fill the earth’[52] even though Noah’s descendants decided to rebel against God’s command. They gathered and proclaimed:

Come, let us build ourselves a city and a tower with its top in the heavens, and let us make a name for ourselves, lest we be dispersed over the face of the whole earth.

The narrative of Babel indicates that the human race had plans for unity and power based on self interest. While unity itself is not a bad thing, in fact it is the mark of the people of God when they conform to God’s purpose. But unity under God is one thing, and unity as proud independence is another.

In the building of the Tower of Babel we see a collective expression of the independence Adam and Eve reached for in the garden. It echoes “the proud aspirations of the serpent’s seed to exalt themselves by showing how much progress they could make on their own in overcoming finitude, needing no help from God…these descendants of Noah had rebelled against God’s command to fill the earth, choosing instead to remain congregated together in order to increase their security.”[53] Fuller makes a wise observation:

“Thus evil could still have triumphed over the woman’s seed. In a supersociety held together by the sanction of the power of the sword, people of various skills could organize themselves a standard of living that could delude them into thinking they could meet all their need and declare themselves independent of God. Thus people like Seth who called upon the name of the Lord would be completely out of step with such a demonic supersociety; they would be pressured from every side not to look to God for contentment but to contribute to the exaltation of humankind’s attainment of self-sufficiency.”[54]

The danger for those who refused to join the anti-God purpose becomes obvious. The ‘serpent-types’ could use their power in numbers and violence to eradicate them. In order to allow woman’s seed to multiply in a world filled with evil people God providentially steps in. God does not permit the people to rebel as a cohesive unit. So, “God confounds the unity that the people wish to maintain for their evil ends.”[55] The disruption of the people at the Tower of Babel is God’s judgment against their unified front of rebellion. This would inevitably allow each of the neighboring nations to hold each other in check, thus no one nation could create an empire that would last for very long. So while the serpent will continue to succeed in giving the people of God a wound, though harmful it will not be lethal.

The Gospel[56] of Jesus Christ

a. The Gospel and Noah:

Noah by his God given righteousness saved not only himself but also his family.[57] In Hebrews 11:7 we read:

By faith Noah, being warned by God concerning events as yet unseen, in reverent fear constructed an ark for the saving of his household. By this he condemned the world and became an heir of the righteousness that comes by faith.

This prefigures the new covenant[58] of Christ. Where are given Christ’s righteousness through faith and repentance, and made part of His spiritual family, through which we will be saved from the destruction of God’s wrath. Remember, the flood brought that primitive world to an end as we read in 2 Peter:

If he [God] did not spare the ancient world, but preserved Noah, a herald of righteousness, with seven others, when he brought a flood upon the world of the ungodly.

This prefigures the final judgment which ends the present heavens and earth and brings about a new world.[59] Christ will be the vessel by which His spiritual family is saved from the wrath of God’s judgment. Similarly, the ‘new world’ that emerges after the flood prefigures the ‘new heaven and new earth.’[60]

Note: Peter declares Noah a ‘herald of righteousness.’ This is extremely important for understanding the often misunderstood 1 Peter 3:18-20. See footnote [61]

Remember, God repeated the command given to man in Genesis 1:28. Noah becomes the new representative for humanity, prefiguring Christ who will be the final head of new humanity.[62] Under the covenant, all who descend from the representative are blessed.

b. The Gospel and the Tower of Babel

Humanity has been divided since the fall. But the tower of Babel shows how this division effects the relationships of whole people groups. We still see the implications of this division today. Goldsworthy notes:

“Despite the desire for world unity there is an inevitable breakdown in human society into smaller units all seeking their own advantage. Sin has a fragmenting effect on human life. This confusion of languages and division of nations will characterize sinful humanity until the redemptive power of God unites in Christ a people drawn from all nations, tribes, and languages.[63][64]

We see the first shift towards the unity of God’s people in Acts 2 where the nations who were scattered at Babel are represented in Jerusalem. The text records that “every nation under heaven”[65] was gathered and heard Peter proclaim the gospel of Jesus Christ.[66] Thus, we can look forward to the day when people from every nation cry out with a loud voice: “Salvation belongs to our God who sits on the throne, and to the Lamb!”[67] One day Christ will gather all who are scattered together, and make all things new.

Continue reading “Biblical Theology- Part 4: God’s Covenant with Noah”

Sermons to Listen to While Snowed In…

Well, it seems like many of us will be snowed in Sunday morning, January 31st. So, I thought I would direct you to a few audio sermons from a few men who I have grown to respect. Check them out while you are stuck inside, they will be well worth the time invested.

John Piper – Pastor of Bethlehem Baptist Church

Tim Keller – Pastor of Redeemer Presbyterian Church

D.A. Carson– Research professor of New Testament at Trinity Evangelical Divinity School

Alistair Begg– Pastor of Parkside Church

Well you get the point, also check out Albert Mohler, Matt Chandler, Mark Dever, Bryan Chapell, Sinclair Ferguson, Wayne Grudem, David Wells, R.C. Sproul, Paul Tripp, Mark Driscoll

Have a good Sunday in the snow!

Biblical Theology- Part 3: The Fall

Note: This series comes from the notes of a course I am teaching on Biblical Theology at Calvary Baptist Church. This material is organized similar to Graeme Goldsworthy’s book According to Plan.

For if, because of one man’s trespass, death reigned through that one man, much more will those who receive the abundance of grace and the free gift of righteousness reign in life through the one man Jesus Christ.[1]

The effects of the fall were catastrophic, and have radically altered the course of history for humanity. The fall of man was no surprise to God. We must remember that God is absolutely sovereign, and His purpose in creation would be realized in spite of the incursion of evil, namely in Jesus Christ. The fall is the “story of sin’s entry into the world and of how God as a result either punished the [unrepentant] for their sins or, on the basis of the future death of Christ, forgave those who honored him by entrusting their future to his mercy.”[2]

The Temptation

The scene is set. Adam and Eve are living in the garden. “The garden is the garden of God” and thus “a place of reception of man into the fellowship of God in Gods own dwelling place.”[3]

Then there is a unit break in the narrative, and we shift to the account of the temptation and the fall.[4] “The conversation between the snake and the woman in the garden brilliantly portrays the process by which the human race became rebellious against the authority of the Creator.”[5] The process begins with the snake asking the woman, “Did God really say…?” The temptation begins with the woman opening up to the possibility of questioning God’s word. Remember, humanity depended on the word of God for correctly understanding creation order. Goldsworthy writes:

“God is the final and absolute authority and, since he has chosen to communicate by His word, his word is the absolute and final authority. The…question has great potential for evil because it casts doubts on the authority of God’s word.”

First, the question that the snake raised was “did God actually say, ‘You shall not eat of any tree in the garden’?”[6] The truth is God had not said that at all, only the fruit of a certain tree was forbidden, not all of them. The evil one’s purpose in asking this was to lead Eve into doubting the credentials of the word. “The assumption was being formed that the word not only could be analyzed and evaluated, but probably needed to be.”[7] Yet in order to evaluate God’s word one must begin with the assumption that it is not the highest authority.

Second, the snake flat out contradicts God’s word by telling the woman that she will not die if she eats of the tree. This is a direct challenge to God’s authoritative word. The snake was basically telling the woman that God did not tell her the truth when he threatened death for deliberate disobedience.

“It was, charges the snake, a deliberate lie: “For God knows that when you eat of it your eyes will be opened, and you will be like God, knowing good and evil” (Genesis 3:5). Thus God is being accused of being motivated by selfishness. This means the He is neither loving nor trustworthy.”[8]

Third, we must remember that God had placed man in the garden with everything good he needed for his well-being. So, the command God gives Adam and Eve shows His loving mercy. Remember, the garden represents how dwelling in the presence of God imparts life to man. Therefore, God warns them not to eat of the tree “so that man may avoid death and the loss of all this goodness.”[9] See, death in Genesis 2:17 is the opposite “of all the good things that God has given them to enjoy, it evidently represents a state of misery and deprivation that [humanity] will experience if they disobey”[10] God’s gracious command.

There is an essential difference in God’s warning and Satan’s temptation here that we do not want to overlook. Behind God’s warning lies good, behind Satan’s temptation lies evil. From this we must conclude that “it was God who had beneficent purposes for man, the serpent had malicious designs.”[11]

What does this have to do with Jesus Christ? Behind the efforts of the fall stood the devil, enticing Adam and Eve to turn from God. This is the same devil who in the gospel accounts “steps out from behind the curtain for a direct confrontation”[12] with Jesus Christ in the temptation in the wilderness. Therefore, in the temptation of Jesus, where Adam represented all of humanity, Christ stands as the new head of the human race that will be obedient in a way that all Adam had not been. Christ fully trusted in God for His wellbeing, while Adam broke fellowship with God with the idea that he could live independently of God.

The Fall

Goldsworthy’s make a notable observation on the cunning of the snake;

“He (the snake) presents lies in the context of truth. Eating the forbidden fruit did indeed mean that the humans came to know good and evil (Genesis 3:22). But the process by which they achieved that involved rebellion against truth and its source. Instead of knowing good and evil by rejecting evil and remaining good, they choose rather to reject good and become evil.” This paragraph points to a few helpful observations;

First, from that point on God’s word would no longer be accepted as self-evident truth, but would be continually tested. In other words, the first humans assert themselves as the evaluators of the validity of God’s word. In this sense they have elevated themselves above God; in their own minds, they have become as their own “God.”

So, after the authority of God’s word is questioned both Adam and Eve take the forbidden fruit and eat. They are, in a sense, saying that God’s word cannot be trusted. By questioning God’s motives in withholding ‘knowledge of good and evil’ they begin to question the reliability of His word. The result was the fall of mankind. Dissatisfied with their humanity our first parents reached for godhood, and paradise was lost. “They degraded themselves by trying to be what they could never be.”[13]

Second, the idiom “knowledge of good and evil” points to an ultimate level of mature independence[14] only possessed by God. So in aspiring for this ‘godlike’ maturity, or ‘moral experience’[15], they also obtained the independence and responsibility that comes along with it. In disobeying God, Adam and Eve considered themselves to be independent of God and took their future welfare into their own hands.

In casting off the protective covering of dependence on God, they found themselves shamefully naked and alone. Daniel Fuller explains the implications of this very well;

“Suddenly Adam and Eve felt the horror of being cut off from God’s loving care for them and found themselves left only to their greatly limited, distorted wisdom and power to provide for themselves an eternally happy future…This sense of total inadequacy then aroused an overwhelming sense of shame and so they tried to cover up their obvious limitations”[16] with their own coverings.

Note: I have been asked “why was the tree placed in the garden?” At the very least we can say that the tree functions as a revelation of God’s independence and man’s dependence on God. It brings to surface the corruptibility of man. God is the only perfect and complete being in the universe. While Adam and Eve were created pure, they were not created perfect. Vos argues, “it is if we should say of somebody that he is liable to the invasion of some disease, but we should not on that account declare him to have the disease.”[17]

God’s Judgment and Mercy

God’s Judgment: They had rejected the authority of God’s word. Since God is just and holy He must pronounce judgment on their faithlessness. It is interesting what happens as God confronts them in their sin;

  1. Adam blames Eve, and God was responsible for giving her as a companion.
  2. Eve blames the snake, and God was responsible for giving humans dominion over the animals as part of creation.

Yet they were both responsible for their actions. Thus, Genesis 3:14-24 is about God’s judgment of mankind for their disobedience. Not only mankind, but all of creation comes under a curse. There are several notable implications of the fall.

a. First, pain[18] is introduced as a reality in the fallen world. Not only so we now experience suffering from physical pain, but also there is discord in human relationships which brings about pain. Part of the judgment is expressed in the “disruption of relationships established by God.”[19] This is revealed in the turmoil of relationships between God and man, man and woman, and man and creation.

b. Second, rebellion becomes a pattern in the fallen world. “The disobedience of Adam consisted in his rejection of the divine boundaries placed upon his dominion of the earth. It was thus a rebellion against the good order of creation established by God in Genesis 1.”[20] God had given Adam and Eve dominion over the earth; now this dominion is challenged by the earth itself. “The curse on the ground is a curse on Adam. The king of the earth has now become the obedient servant of the soil. The freedom to eat from all the trees in the garden is replaced by the struggle to get the earth to yield necessary daily bread.”[21]

c. Third, there is no paradise in a fallen world. The human race is removed from the garden, where life is abundant. Living ‘in the garden’ is parallel with fellowship with God. “There is no way in which he (Adam) can regain that dominion for himself; he is barred from Eden by the cherubim.”[22] From this point on life is nothing more than existence in the face of death. God allows the human race to exist in order that His greater purpose might be fulfilled.

God’s Mercy: Also, while God’s justice is seen in their punishment, God’s love is seen in the merciful grace He extends to Adam and Eve in that moment.

a. First, “God declares[23] that Eve’s seed would[24] bring about a final and decisive triumph over the serpent and all the evil that he represents.”[25] So, the promise is that somehow out of the human race a fatal blow will come and crush the head of the serpent. Keep in mind, the power of evil is a collective power, a kingdom of evil of which Satan is the head. So in crushing the head the whole kingdom falls.[26] Therefore, God’s purpose for creation will be realized despite the fall and all the evil that is ushered in. What we see in the generations of Genesis is that “through the dark and bloody history of human sin and violence, God continues the line of the promise.”[27]

b. Second, it becomes obvious that “by the work of their hands” Adam and Eve cannot cover their nakedness in the garden suitably. This implies the truth that they “could not restore the unity they once had with God, nor could their works shield them from the judgment of God.”[28] Yet, after the fall God clothes Adam and Eve with more suitable garments than fig leaves, he provides them with coverings made of animal skin. In the same way, God later provides righteousness through Christ so that His people may be clothed in righteousness which will shield them from the wrath of God.

The ‘Seed of Satan’ and the ‘Seed of Woman.’

In executing the punishment that was to befall creation God declared;

I will put enmity between you and the woman,
and between your offspring and her offspring
(offspring = seed);
he shall bruise your head,
and you shall bruise his heel.
[29]

Notice that God mentions two lines of offspring in this declaration, one line from the woman[30] and one line from the serpent. The bruising of the serpents head[31] points forward to the defeat of Satan[32] by a future descendant of the woman, namely Jesus Christ[33]. Jesus prevailed and thus fulfilled the call given to Adam. In the declaration of Genesis 3:15 and in these two lines we catch our first glimpse of God’s purpose for redemptive history, the gospel of Jesus Christ.[34]

In Genesis 4[35] we see how this plays out. Cain represents the seed of Satan, and Abel represents the seed of woman. The enmity between the two seeds is shown between the Brothers when they both offer a sacrifice to God and only Abel’s is looked upon with favor. Goldsworthy writes;

“Cain refuses God’s verdict in which his offering is rejected and his brother’s accepted.[36] He responds in anger directed at Abel and kills him. Human conflict is thus shown to be the consequence of broken fellowship with God. There is anger at God when it [favor] is shown to another.”

The anger provoked in Cain distinguishes him from Abel as one who receives God’s kindness. “The slaying of Abel by Cain illustrates a rapid development of sin, issuing into murder in the second generation.”[37]

What cannot be overlooked is that it was in God’s gracious mercy that Abel was shown mercy. There was no essential difference between Cain and Abel; they were both equally depraved by sin.[38] But something happened in Abel’s heart that permitted him to respond to God in faith. It would seem that the only reason Abel offered a sacrifice that pleased God was that God had given him a new heart.[39]

Therefore, Abel was willing to give up the most valuable of his flock in faith[40]. The difference was simple;

Abel “was banking his confidence for an eternally happy and fulfilled future upon God, Cain [it seems] had placed his confidence in himself, in his energy and skill in getting the land to yield crops.”[41]

When Cain kills Abel in anger we see a further display of his evil heart.[42] Notice that God judges him with a similar judgment that his father Adam received.[43] Yet God shows Cain mercy also by protecting him from the vengeance of men to preserve the human race. This grace shown to both brothers is representative of the kindness of God that will be shown to humanity all throughout redemptive history.

The Seed of Satan: Note a few observations about Cain and his descendants[44];

a. First, Cain and his descendants build a city in attempt to live dependently from God, and to find refuge from those who would kill him. In Biblical literature cities often become concentrations of human wickedness.[45] “It is not that human society itself is wrong, but the use of it to escape the implications of God’s rule.”[46] Fuller observes that “a city gathered together many people with a wide diversity of valued skills, and as each benefited from the others abilities, they all enjoyed a much higher standard of living and felt less need to depend on God.”[47] Only in the heavenly Jerusalem will human society function properly when brought into prefect relationship with God, through Christ.

b. Second, Cain’s descendants are known for the domestication of animals, art, music, and for violence.[48] But, “in spite of their unlocking of the potential of God’s creation, they remain rebels.”[49] Here we see the evidence of God’s goodness[50] continuing in a world of wicked people. We should not make the mistake of stamping society itself and its demonstrations of creativity as inherently evil. “By the grace of God human society continues, but within it are seeds of self-destruction in the breakdown of human relationships. This grace is the gift of preservation of the race for a time, but it is not the grace that acts to redeem and to restore a people to friendship with God.

The Seed of Woman: While Abel was murdered by Cain, God continued the seed of woman through Adam and Eve’s next son Seth.[51] It was through Seth’s[52] line that people began to “call upon the name of the Lord.”[53] So, in Genesis 4:1 Eve[54] is not only rejoicing that she has bore another son, but that God is remaining faithful to His promise to bring about judgment upon the evil one.

Now, in Genesis 6 we see the climax of human wickedness. The “sons of God” begin to marry the daughters of men which brings about the judgment[55] of God.[56] The “Sons of God” in this verse is a reference to the Sethites[57] (those in Seth’s line). So men in the Godly line of Seth began to marry women from the ungodly line of Cain. Therefore, these marriages increased the Cainite-types in the earth at the expense of the godly Sethites. “How opposite this filling of the earth with violence was from God’s purpose in creating it. He had intended to fill the earth with His glory by having people made in His image”[58] reflect His order.

The wickedness increases and God was sorry, and grieved over the violence in the earth which He had created as pure and good.[59] In other words, God had enough with the wickedness in the world, and thus declares the judgment of the flood.

The Kingdom and the Fall

Because of God’s ultimate purposes He does not withdraw His love from creation. However, sin has had devastating effects between God and creation, man and creation, and creation in general. But God is still sovereign and human rebellion will not thwart his purposes.

We need to distinguish between the kingdom of God and the fallen universe. The fallen universe is the very opposite of the kingdom. Only through salvation will the kingdom be restored. In salvation Christ will bring all relationships back to their proper place. This is the supreme irony of the cross, that Satan’s apparent victory in the fall was his defeat.[60] The cross was in God’s plan for redemption history before creation[61] as the plan for restoration. Now, “it is the task of Biblical Theology to describe the way the Bible reveals this restoration taking place.”[62]

A Course On Biblical Theology

Continue reading “Biblical Theology- Part 3: The Fall”

Biblical Theology- Part 2: Creation

Note: This series comes from the notes of a course I am teaching on Biblical Theology at Calvary Baptist Church. This material is organized similar to Graeme Goldsworthy’s book According to Plan.

In the narrative of creation we see God set the stage for the story of redemption. Goldsworthy writes that in the beginning we see “the preamble and theological presupposition of the main aspects of salvation history.”[1] But before we examine the beginning of human history we must look into eternity past to see the purpose of creation;

Before the mountains were brought forth,
or ever you had formed the earth and the world,
from everlasting to everlasting you are God.
[2]

God’s Purpose in Creation

God has always been. The scripture attests to the doctrine of God’s eternal nature or God’s timelessness.[3] God has no beginning, He has always been. Not only that, but God has always been absolutely complete, delighting in Himself as the perfect Trinity. Among the persons of the Trinity there has been perfect love and fellowship for all of eternity.[4] This is called the doctrine of God’s independence.

Why then did God freely[5] choose to create? Daniel Fuller makes an interesting observation concerning the purpose of creation when he asks, “why was He (God) not perfectly content to remain simply as the fully happy Trinity?”[6] This question reveals, at the very least, that there must be an underlying purpose for all things God has created. The Apostle Paul addresses this query in the Scripture;

For his invisible attributes, namely, his eternal power and divine nature, have been clearly perceived, ever since the creation of the world, in the things that have been made.[7][8]

For by him all things were created, in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or dominions or rulers or authorities—all things were created through him and for him.[9]

First we see that God created to make Himself known. Secondly, we see that Jesus Christ is the agent of creation and also the beneficiary of its existence. We must avoid the arrogant ‘man-centered’ assumption that earth exists solely for our use and enjoyment. The primary reason creation exists for the praise and glory of its creator God.[10]

We know from the creation account that everything was made ‘good’[11] to reflect the glory of God in its own way. “Part of the meaning of the goodness of creation in the Bible is that it testifies[12] to the God who made it, reflecting something of His good character.”[13] In fact, creation is only good by virtue of standing in appropriate relationship to it creator.

Simply put, the end for which God created the world was to glorify Himself.[14] This truth is often hard to swallow because it seems vain, and it removes us from the center of existence. But God is the only being in the universe for whom self glorification is not vain. Think about it, if God is the greatest being in the universe, the most precious gift, then displaying Himself in creation is an act of love, He displays His own glory for our joy. John Piper writes;

In all of redemptive history, from beginning to ending, God has this one ultimate goal: that God be glorified. The aim of God in all that he does is most ultimately the praise of his glory. All of redemptive history is book-ended by this amazing purpose. And in the middle of that redemptive history stands the greatest event in the history of the world, the death and resurrection of Jesus Christ.[15]

The primary reason God created was to make His glory known, and His glory is known most fully in Jesus Christ. The Scripture testifies that all things were created through Christ and for Christ. So “Christ is not only the origin of the cosmos; He is also its goal. All things were created for Him, i.e., to be subject to and to glorify Him.”[16]

God Created, Orders, Sustains, and Communicates By His Word[17]

“Foundational to Biblical Theology is the conviction that God has spoken.” God has spoken “through His word, and God has revealed Himself and His will…on behalf”[18] of creation. More importantly, we believe that “God reveals Himself and His ways in the created world and in His deeds in history, but His word is essential for a proper understanding of what creation and history reveal.”[19]

a. God Creates by Word

At eight points in Genesis 1 God speaks creatively: “And God said, Let…”[20] God commands and it is so. Why is it significant that God created by His word?[21] At least “the very effortlessness of the fulfillment indicates God’s sovereignty.”[22] It is also notable that God created all things out of nothing.[23] In other words, there was no ‘raw material’ present until God brought all things into existence.

b. God Establishes Order by Word

The word of God established order within creation, and does so with a purpose. So creation is not only a question of beginnings, but also of purpose and relationships. In Genesis we have two creation accounts, the first in chapter 1 and the other in chapter 2. These two accounts provide different perspectives on the structure of the one creation event.

“The Genesis accounts tell that there is a structure to the creation which is described first in terms of the main elements of the universe and their relationships (Genesis 1), and second in terms of human beings and their relationships (Genesis 2).”

Creation is presented in this way by the writer of the Pentateuch to show that there is order in the universe. In other words, everything has a proper function and relationship which impacts everything within creation order.

c. God Sustains by Word

God not only created and established order in the universe but also governs it.[24] “This providence, or continued government of the universe by the Creator becomes a prominent feature of the biblical understanding of the ultimate purpose of God which nothing, not even sin, is allowed to frustrate.”[25] So, by setting structure to all things within creation and designating their functions, God sustains His purposes.[26]

So, on a very general level, the Genesis creation accounts tell us about how things began, and explain the relationships between things. How things relate is closely tied to their purpose. “These relationships, which were later confused by sin, are at the heart of the gospel by which God is restoring all things to their proper relationships.”[27]

d. God Communicates by Word

Since God reveals His character and purposes, it is part of His relationship with His people. God freely chooses to relate to creation by His word. In keeping with this is the fact that when He creates the human pair He blesses them by addressing them with a spoken word. This is unique for humanity that God can address us with words and we can understand them. The word that God speaks establishes and interprets the context within which human beings exist and relate to everything else in creation.

These truths are amazing and reveal some astonishing realities; Goldsworthy points out that;

  1. The greatness of God is shown by His needing only to say, “Let it be…” for things to be brought into existence.
  2. Creation by word also shows us that God has chosen to relate to all things by the means of His word.
  3. The rule of God over His creation through His word shows the real distinction between God and creation.[28]

What does this have to do with Jesus Christ? The writer of Hebrews declares that;

Long ago, at many times and in many ways, God spoke to our fathers by the prophets, but in these last days he has spoken to us by his Son.[29]

God’s mode of speaking changes in Jesus Christ. Jesus Christ is the word of God in flesh. “In His person and work Jesus becomes the ultimate form of God’s communication.”[30] In fact the gospel of Jesus Christ we receive the message of a new creation and restored order.[31]

Creation and The Kingdom of God

Our creator king loves His creation. In Genesis we see that God has created all things and established them in a fixed order of relationships, to which he declares “they are very good.” These words are significant.

“The free act of creation and God’s approval indicated by the words “very good,” point to a loving and immensely strong commitment on God’s part towards creation” which becomes more fully understood as the drama of history unfolds.[32]

This loving relationship begins with the opening announcement of the Bible narrative: “In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth.” The God who created also rules over His creation, creation is therefore established as the “Kingdom of God.” Goldsworthy elaborates on God’s Kingdom as follows;

“God’s rule involves the relationships that He has set up between Himself and everything in creation…the focus of the kingdom of God is on the relationship between God and His people. Man is subject to God, while the rest of creation is subject to man.”[33]

So, we may understand the Kingdom of God as following: “there is a King who rules, a people who are ruled, and a sphere where this rule is recognized as taking place.”[34] So we have;

  1. God’s people
  2. In God’s place
  3. Under God’s rule

In the Garden of Eden we are introduced to the Kingdom of God[35], a theme that extends over the whole of the Bible. In the Garden of Eden the pattern for the Kingdom is established. Here we see an innocent people of God living in a perfect environment for them called paradise, where the rule of God is expressed by His word, which provides us with the pattern of the Kingdom of God.

“God establishes a perfect creation that he loves and over which he rules…The kingdom means that everything in creation relates perfectly, that is, as God intends it should, to everything else and to God himself.”

In Jesus the Kingdom comes. Jesus words bear witness to this fact, “the time is fulfilled, and the kingdom of God is at hand; repent and believe in the gospel.”[36] Goldsworthy argues that “He was at once both creator and creature, king and obedient servant, word of God and listening servant. Thus Jesus…not only brings the kingdom, He is the Kingdom in Himself.”[37] One day, God’s Kingdom will be fully consummated at Christ’s return.

The Creation of Man in the Image of God

In Genesis[38] we are told that man is made in the image of God, yet we are not told exactly what that means. At the very least this shows “the remarkable distinctiveness”[39] of man compared to the rest of creation. Human beings are unique among creation and have been given a distinct relationship to God in being ‘made in His image.’ Here are some observations based on that relationship;

a. Humans Represent God: Being created in the ‘image of God’, as the climax of creation, man has a specific role to fill. The image for “Man mediates between the Creator and the created world which he is part. In man God deals with His creation personally.”[40] Man was created in such a way that he is able to represent God on earth “like an ambassador from a foreign country.”[41]

b. Humans Reflect God: The image of God can be also be understood as being created in ‘the likeness of God.’ As a mirror reflects, so man should reflect God. “Another way of putting this is to say that in man God is to become visible on earth.”[42] In man we should see a reflection of God’s love, justice, grace, etc.

c. Humans Rule Under God: Another aspect of being created in the image of God refers to our dominion over creation. Therefore, the image of God shows that man is set directly under God in the order of creation.[43] Only man is addressed as one who knows God and is created to live purposefully for God. Man’s responsibility as an image bearer is tied to his dominion over creation.

“When man falls because of sin the creation is made to fall with him. In order to restore the whole of creation, God works through His Son who becomes a man to restore man. The whole creation waits eagerly for the redeemed people of God to be finally revealed as God’s perfected children, because at this point the creation will be released from its own bondage. This overview of man as the object of God’s covenant love and redemption confirms the central significance given to man in Genesis 1-2.”[44]

While the Bible does not clearly define (in exact terms) what is meant by being created in the ‘image of God’ at the beginning of creation, we can look to look forward to Jesus Christ as the ‘true image of God.’

What we see in Christ tells us what we should be like, which reveals shame on our part, it shows us that something is not right. In other words, we do not represent, reflect, or rule on earth in the way we were created to do, the way that brings ultimate glory to God. But Christ did. When Christ was on earth He was;

  1. Wholly directed towards God.
  2. Wholly directed towards neighbor
  3. Ruled over nature

So the image of God in humanity was not only brought about by Christ in creation but was also patterned after Christ.[45]

Man a Created Creature Who is Ruled

The creation account shows us that everything we have is a gift from God. This is one of the central truths of creation that destroys modern man’s idea that ‘he/she is in charge of their lives and destiny.’ As God’s creation we are totally dependent on Him for everything;

  1. We are dependent on God for His continual rule over creation.
  2. We are dependent on God for His providential care.
  3. We are dependent on God for the production of food.
  4. We are dependent on God for drawing our next breath.
  5. We are dependent on God for the next beat of our hearts.

The list goes on and on. There is nothing in this universe that is self sustaining except God. Every moment of our existence shows God’s grace in that He sustains the very substance of creation. If Almighty God were to withdraw His powerful word from creation the universe would cease to exist, there would be no order, nothing to sustain the universe;

“This is why man does not live by bread alone, but by every word that comes out of the mouth of God[46]. So Christ, as the creative Word of God, sustains ‘all things by His powerful word’[47], and ‘in Him all things hold together’[48].”

We have already argued that man is unique in creation as being created in the image of God. Part of being created in the image of God tells us that “humanity does not truly exist apart from[49] a special relationship with God.”[50] It is in relationship with God that we, as human beings, understand our function within creation. Human beings are uniquely responsible to God in that we must answer to our maker.

Within creation humans were given dominion over the rest of creation.[51] “Human life is defined by its God given freedom and by bounds and sanctions”[52] which makes humanity responsible creatures. But, we only have sanctioned freedom. We are not completely autonomous beings, we do not have ‘free will’ is the absolute sense. God is the only free being in the universe.

“In Genesis 1:28 it is implied that we are created to make real choices between real options, even though this freedom is bound by the prescription to be fruitful and rule the earth. Without freedom to make real choices it would be impossible to rule…[but notice] they have no freedom as to the consequences if they eat of the one forbidden tree.”[53]

Thus with freedom and responsibility comes a test of obedience in the prohibition placed on eating from the tree of knowledge of good and evil. God designated this tree “as off limits as the means of showing the difference between good and evil.”

Conclusion

Remember, Jesus Christ is the center of history, which means He is the center of creation. Jesus was not only involved in the original creative act, but is also intimately associated with God continued providential care of creation. As the ‘true image’ of God, Jesus Christ is the point of contact between the creator and creation.[54]

A Course On Biblical Theology

Continue reading “Biblical Theology- Part 2: Creation”